摘要
中西绘画不同的哲学基础,使得对于它们的观照也有不同的视角。我们的艺术史学科还处于起步探索阶段,而西方艺术史研究已经形成了一套相对完整的学科体系。几十年来西方艺术史研究方法的演变发展,对中国绘画史研究具有一定的借鉴意义。本文试通过对上世纪初期到中叶,并影响至今的几种西方艺术史研究方法的阐述,分析个别方法试图解决的问题,以及最后未能解决的问题。通过这种梳理,期待从新的意义层面来透视出一些问题,并在此基础上,谈谈对中国传统绘画研究的独特性的一点理解。
Different philosophical basis for their different perspective. However, as we explore the appearance of Chinese painting and western painting have made art history disciplines stage, the Western art history research has created a relatively complete system of disciplines. For decades the evolution of this system has given our study of the history of Chinese painting a certain significance. This article is trying to discuss several western art history research methods of the middle of the last century to the early, and analyze some problems which is failed to be resolved by each method. I raised several questions out of such new perspectives, and want to get an unique understanding about the study of traditional Chinese painting.
出处
《北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第5期139-146,共8页
Journal of Peking University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
研究方法
西方艺术史
中国绘画史
形式
语言
research method
Western art history
the history of Chinese painting
form
language