摘要
The study used glyphosate resistant Brassica napus,planted in the field of Mianyang Normal College.The glyphosate resistant Brassica napus seeds wereplanted in the middle field,and the wild Brassica napus and Orychophragmus Violaceus were planted around the glyphosate resistant Brassica napus,in different directions in nature environment in 25 meters.The second year the wild Brassica napus and Orychophragmus Violaceus seeds were plantde in the field,and sprayed more glyphosate on the plants,and selected the plants which were not died.The leaves of not died wild Brassica napus were checked in the lab by PCR and Southern blot.The result indicated that four wild Brassica napus plant got the EPSPS gene from the glyphosate resistant Brassica napus,there are no gene flow between Orychophragmus Violaceus and glyphosate resistant Brassica napus.
The study used glyphosate resistant Brassica napus, planted in the field of Mianyang Normal College. The glyphosate resistant Brassica napus seeds wereplanted in the middle field , and the wild Brassica napus and Orychophragmus Violaceus were planted around the glyphosate resistant Brassica napus, in different directions in nature environment in 25 meters. The second year the wild Brassica napus and Orychophragmus Violaceus seeds were plantde in the field , and sprayed more glyphosate on the plants , and selected the plants which were not died . The leaves of not died wild Brassica napus were checked in the lab by PCR and Southern blot. The result indicated that four wild Brassica napus plant got the EPSPS gene from the glyphosate resistant Brassica napus, there are no gene flow between Orychophragrnus Violaceus and glyphosate resistant Brassica napus.
出处
《四川大学学报(自然科学版)》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第5期1162-1164,共3页
Journal of Sichuan University(Natural Science Edition)
基金
四川省教育厅自然科学基金(2003B044)
绵阳师范学院科研基金(MA2003006)
绵阳市应用技术研发基金(2004BS007)