期刊文献+

用Monte Carlo方法分析CGE模型的不确定性 被引量:5

Uncertainty analysis of CGE model using Monte Carlo method
原文传递
导出
摘要 采用Monte Carlo方法研究可计算一般均衡(CGE)模型参数不确定性传播问题,开发了随机计算工具。通过拒绝法由正态分布的随机数获得卢分布随机数,并利用拉丁超立方体抽样方法对TEDCGE模型的50个自由参数进行随机采样,考察模型输出的不确定性。考虑参数的不确定性时,中国2010年相对于基准情景减排碳排放量30%的边际成本的95%置信区间为(345,600)元/t,相应的国民生产总值(GDP)损失率置信区间为(0.85%,1.35%),GDP损失总量将在1415~2270亿元(2000年价格)之间。自由参数的相关性将带来显著影响,当参数之间是正的相关关系时,模型结果的不确定性将进一步扩大。 A solution method for the stochastic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model was tested using a Monte Carlo method to investigate the uncertainty propagation in CGE models. 50 elasticity parameters in a CGE model were treated as random variables with an assumed β distribution, The variables include the carbon tax rate and the GDP loss corresponding to various carbon reduction levels in China. The analysis shows that the confidence interval of the marginal carbon reduction cost is 345 -600 RMB/t using year 2000 prices with 95% confidence when controlling the carbon emissions to 30% lower than the business as usual (BAU) level in 2010. The corresponding confidence level for the GDP loss is 0.85% - 1.35% for a total GDP loss of 141.5 - 227.0 billion RMB in year 2000 prices. The correlations among the uncertainity parameters have much greater effect on the output uncertainty.
作者 王灿 陈吉宁
出处 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第9期1555-1559,共5页 Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)
基金 国家"十五"科技攻关项目(2004-BA611B-03)
关键词 可计算一般均衡模型 不确定性分析 MONTE Carlo法 碳减排 computable general equilibrium (CGE) model uncertainty analysis Monte Carlo method carbon emission reduction
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Harrison G W,Jensen S E H,Pedersen L H,et al.Using Dynamic General Equilibrium Models for Policy Analysis[M].Amsterdam;New York:Elsevier,2000.
  • 2王灿,陈吉宁,邹骥.可计算一般均衡模型理论及其在气候变化研究中的应用[J].上海环境科学,2003,22(3):206-212. 被引量:13
  • 3McKitrick R R.The econometric critique of computable general equilibrium modeling:The role of functional forms[J].Economic Modelling,1998,15:543-573.
  • 4Mansur A,Whalley J.Applied General Equilibrium Analysis[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1984.
  • 5Abdelkhalek T,Dufour J.Statistical inference for computable general equilibrium models,with application to a model of the Moroccan economy[J].Review of Economics & Statistics,1998,80(4):520-534.
  • 6Abler D G,Rodríguez A G,Shortle J S.Parameter uncertainty in CGE modeling of the environmental impacts of economic policies[J].Environmental and Resource Economics,1999,14(2):75-94.
  • 7Papathanasiou D,Anderson D.Uncertainties in responding to climate change:On the economic value of technology policies for reducing costs and creating options[J].The Energy Journal,2001,22(3):79-114.
  • 8Harrison G W,Vinod H D.The sensitivity analysis of applied general equilibrium models:Completely randomized factorial sampling designs[J].Review of Economics and Statistics,1992,74(2):357-362.
  • 9王灿,陈吉宁,邹骥.基于CGE模型的CO_2减排对中国经济的影响[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2005,45(12):1621-1624. 被引量:191
  • 10Evans M,Hastings N,Peacock J B.Statistical Distributions[M].New York:Wiley,2000.

二级参考文献36

  • 1陈文颖,高鹏飞,何建坤.二氧化碳减排对中国未来GDP增长的影响[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2004,44(6):744-747. 被引量:87
  • 2[8]Manne A, Mendelsohn R, Richels R. MERGE: a model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies. Energy Policy, 1995, 23(1):17 ~ 34.
  • 3[9]Goulder L. Effects of carbon taxes in an economy with prior tax distortions: an inter-temporal general equilibrium analysis. Journal of environmental economics and management, 1995, 29:271~297.
  • 4[10]Farmer K, K Steininger. Reducing CO2 emissions under fiscal retrenchment: a multi-cohort CGEmodel for Austria. Environmental and resource economics, 1998, 12:255~288.
  • 5[11]Gottinger H. Greenhouse gas economics and computable general equilibrium. Journal of policy modeling, 1998, 20(5):537~580.
  • 6[12]Zhang Z. Macroeconomic effects of CO2 emission limits: a computable general equilibrium analysis for China. Journal of policy modeling, 1998, 20(2):213 ~250.
  • 7[13]Garbaccio R, M Ho, D Jorgenson. Controlling carbon emissions in China. Environment and development economics, 1999, 4:493~518.
  • 8[14]Pan J, Van Leeuwen N, Timmer H, et al. Economic impact of mitigation measures, proceedings of IPCC expert meeting on economic impact of mitigation measures. The Hague, The netherlands,1999, 5:27~28.
  • 9[15]Brendemoen A, H Vennemo. A climate treaty and the norwegian economy: a CGE assessment. The energy journal, 1994, 15:77~93.
  • 10[16]Burtraw D, M Toman. The benefits of reduced air pollutants in the U.S. from greenhouse gas mitigation policies. RFF report, 1998.

共引文献198

同被引文献93

引证文献5

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部