期刊文献+

比较教育和社会学的关系史及其分析 被引量:6

An Analysis of the Relationship between Comparative Education and Sociology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文基于西方比较教育发展的社会科学化史观,首先考察了社会学视野中的比较教育与社会学的历史关系,然后提出比较教育在问题域的形成、措辞方式、理论框架的构建、方法论的建立等方面都借用了社会学的话语、理论和方法。最后指出比较教育应创造出供其他学科消费的知识产品,以改变单向度借用的状态,最终促进自身的不断发展。 Based on a social scientific vision of the development of western comparative education, this article first reviews the historical relationship between comparative education and sociology from a perspective of sociology. It then presents argues that comparative education has been employing the discourse, theories and methods of sociology in its problem formulation, wording, framework construction and formation of methodology. Finally the author puts forward the point that comparative education should produce scholarship that can be utilized by other subjects, so that the situation of comparative education as a borrower can be changed and its development can be advanced.
作者 乐先莲
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第10期42-47,共6页 International and Comparative Education
关键词 比较教育 社会学 历史关系 理论框架 方法论 comparative education sociology history of relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1朱旭东.试论西方比较教育研究的社会科学化历史[J].全球教育展望,2004,33(1):64-70. 被引量:5
  • 2Jill Moore. Comparative Education and Sociolinguistics. Comparative Education Review, 1972, (9):57-61.
  • 3Phillip.E.Jones. Comparative Education: Purpose and Method, Queensland: University of Queensland Press,1971, p48.
  • 4Brain Holmes. Comparative Education: Some Consideration of Method, London: George allen & Unwin Ltd,1981,p.39.
  • 5Anderson C A. Sociology in the Service of Comparative Education. International Review of Education, 1959, (3): 310-318.
  • 6[美]劳丹.进步及其问题[M].刘新民译.北京:华夏出版社.1999.59—60.
  • 7Kazamias. Andresa M. and Massinalas. Byron G. Tradition and Change in Education: a Comparative Study.New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.Inc.Englewood Cliffs, 1965, p. 1.

二级参考文献29

  • 1Holmes. B, Comparaative Educalion: Some Cousiderations of Method, London : George Allen & Unwin. 1981 . p. 13.
  • 2Nicholas Hans .Comparative Education:A Study of Factors and Traditions(London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 1949); Isaac Kandel. Studies in Comparative Education (London: George Harrap, 1933). The New Era in Education (London: George Harrap, 1955);Friedrieh Schneider. Triebkr der P dagogik der V lker (Salzburg: Otto Muller. 1947). Vergleichende Erziehungswissensehaft (Heigelberg : Quelle and Meyer, 1961 ).
  • 3Bereday. G Z F Comparative Methods in Education. New York : Rinehart & Winston. 1964; Brickman. W W A Historical Introduction to Comparative Education,' Comparative Educational Review, 1960.3(3)6-13.
  • 4Eckstein,A and Noah.H J ,Scientific Investigations in Comparative Education. London: Macmillan. 1969.
  • 5Kazamias and Massialas. Tradition and Change in Edueation:a Comparative Study,p. 3.
  • 6Mallinson, Vernoon, An Introduction to the Study of Comparative Education.London:Heinemann,1960,p. 28.
  • 7Hans, Nicholas A , The Principles of Educational Policy: a study in Comparative Education, London: P S King & Son.Ltd. ,1933.p. 236.
  • 8Coleman, James S ed. , Education and Political Development,New Jersey :Princeton University Press, 1965.
  • 9Holmes.Brian, The Contribution of History to a Science of Education, ' in Paul Nash, ed. , History and Education : the educational uses of the past,New York:Random House,1970,p. 308.
  • 10Kazamias and Massialas.Tradition and Change in Education: a Comparative Study.p. 5. ).

共引文献7

同被引文献95

引证文献6

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部