期刊文献+

产妇产后对分娩方式的再认识 被引量:32

Women's perceptions of delivery modes after delivery.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨产妇产后近期对分娩方式的再认识。方法:采用前瞻性研究设计,在产后健康检查时开展面对面问卷调查和小组访谈。结果:有598例产妇(其中剖宫产、阴道分娩组各299例)回答了再次选择分娩方式时的选择意愿。共有63.7%的对象愿意选择阴道分娩,其中剖宫产组产妇接近一半将重新选择阴道分娩,而78.6%的阴道分娩产妇坚持原来的分娩方式。两组选择阴道分娩的最主要原因都是“阴道分娩产后恢复快”和“阴道分娩对母儿有利”。阴道分娩产妇选择剖宫产的主要原因是惧怕所经历的阴道分娩痛,而剖宫产组选择剖宫产的主要原因是剖宫产痛苦少、安全并且快捷方便,避免阴道分娩痛。小组访谈结果表明多数产妇当初分娩方式的选择受身边年轻母亲分娩方式的影响。两种不同分娩方式的产妇都比较满意自己所经历的分娩方式,只是阴道分娩组产妇对于都要进行会阴侧切感到不满意。结论:多数产妇满意自己所经历的分娩方式,再次选择时多数倾向选择阴道分娩。改进围产期服务模式和实施产科适宜技术,将更能体现两种分娩方式中阴道分娩的比较优势。 Objective: To explore the perceptions of new mothers regarding delivery modes. Methods: Women without complicated pregnancy were interviewed face - to - face with questionnaires and through focus group discussion 'after delivery in a prospective study. Results: 598 women completed an early postpartum questioncaire, 299 each in caesarean section and vaginal delivery groups. 63, 7% of all primiparas would opt for yaginal delivery if given the chance to choose the delivery mode again. Half in the caesarean section group and 78. 6% of vaginal delivery group made such choice. Women who would like to choose vaginal delivery in both groups were mostly for faster recovery and for that vaginal delivery was beneficial to both mother and infant health. 71. 4% in the vaginal delivery group who preferred caesarean section attributed their choice to avoid the experienc, ed labor pain. Most of those who stick to their previous mode in the caesarean section group regarded caesarean section as a less pain, safer, and more convenient mode. The findings in the focus group discussions were similar to those of the questionnaires. The previous choice of delivery mode was affected hy other new mothers' maternity experiences. All of them were almost satisfied with their respective mode of delivery. While many primiparas in the vaginal delivery group were dissatisfied with the routinely performed episiotomy. Conclusion: Almost all primiparas in both groups are satisfied with their respective mode of delivery. Most of them would prefer vaginal birth if they have the chance to choose the delivery- mode again. To improve the quality of maternal health care and evidence - based obstetric practices that may be widely used with vaginal birth will show the spontaneous delivery's superiority over the surgical interventions.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2006年第20期2784-2787,共4页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
基金 国家自然科学基金委员会资助项目(30070667)
关键词 分娩方式 产妇 认识 Delivery mode Maternal Perception
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Leung GM, l..am TH, Wong Iet al. Caesarean section rate in England and Wales. Caesareanseetion rates in Hong Kong. BMJ. 2002. 324(7335) : 486
  • 2黄醒华.对剖宫产术的思考[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,2003,19(7):385-388. 被引量:891
  • 3熊巨洋,杜玉开,陈汉平.武汉市剖宫产流行特征及其影响因素研究[J].中国妇幼保健,2005,20(3):298-300. 被引量:15
  • 4彭检妹.2497例剖宫产原因分析与护理对策[J].护理学杂志(综合版),2002,17(8):594-596. 被引量:22
  • 5C. Lo Patients' attitudes vs. physicians' determination : implications for cesarean sections. Social Science & Medicine, 2003, 57:91
  • 6Chong, E. S, and M. Mongelli. Attitudes of Singapore women toward cesarean and vaginal deliveries. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet, 2003, 80:189
  • 7王炳顺,周利锋,高尔生,朱丽萍,高晓玲.孕妇对分娩方式的意愿及其原因[J].中国妇幼保健,2005,20(22):2920-2924. 被引量:34
  • 8Tatar M, Gunalp S, Somunoglu S, et al. Women's perceptions of caesarcan section: reflections from a Turkish teaching hospital. Soc Sci Med.2000, 50 (9): 1227
  • 9Behague DP, Victora CG, Barros FC. Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: population based cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods. BMJ, 2002, 324:942
  • 10Bewley S, Cockburn J. Responding to fear of childbirth. Lancet,2002, 359:2128

二级参考文献38

  • 1凌萝达.重视头位难产[J].中国实用妇科与产科杂志,1994,10(4):194-195. 被引量:58
  • 2Richard HP , David AM. Cesarean birth : how to reduce the rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1995, 172 (6): 1903.
  • 3Porreco RP, Thorp JA. The cesarean birth epidemic: trends, causes,and solutions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996, 175 (2) : 369.
  • 4Parrish Km, Holt VL, Easteding TR et al. Effect of changes in maternalage, parity, and birth weight distribution on primary cesarean delivery rate. JAMA. 1994, 271 (6): 443.
  • 5Rozenberg P, Ville Y. Once a Cesarean section, always a Cesarean section: back to the future? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 21 (2):103.
  • 6Curzik D, Topolovec Z, Sijanovic S. Maternal overnutrition and preg-nancy. Acta Med Croatica, 2002, 56 (1): 31.
  • 7Leung GM, Lam TH, Wong I et al. Caesarean section rate in England and Wales. Caesarean section rates in Hong Kong. BMJ, 2002, 324:7335.
  • 8Aslam MF, Gilmour K, Fawdry RD. Who wants a caesarean section? A study of women's personal experience of vaginal and caesarean delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2003, 23:364.
  • 9Penna L, Arulkumaraxn S. Cesarean section for non-medical reasons. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2003, 82: 399.
  • 10Lo C. Patients' attitudes vs. physicians' determination: implications for cesarean sections. Social Science &Medicine, 2003, 57:91.

共引文献965

同被引文献284

引证文献32

二级引证文献270

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部