摘要
目的:比较涂片革兰染色、培养和实时荧光定量PCR(FQ-PCR)检测妇科性病淋球菌感染的临床应用价值,寻找一种快速而敏感的淋球菌检测方法。方法:同时用涂片革兰染色、培养和FQ-PCR检测临床疑诊淋病123例女性阴道标本中的淋球菌,以培养法为“金标准”,将另外两种方法与之比较,分别计算其敏感性、特异性、阳性预期值和阴性预期值。结果:涂片检出率为76.4%、培养法检出率为66.7%、FQ-PCR检出率为69.9%;经配对计数资料χ2检验,FQ-PCR与培养法的检出率比较差异无显著性(P>0.05)。涂片法和FQ-PCR法的敏感性、特异性、阳性预期值和阴性预期值分别为94.2%、66.7%、87.2%、82.8%和97.6%、89.7%、95.3%、94.6%。结论:FQ-PCR检测淋球菌,可弥补涂片法较粗糙、培养法耗时长的缺点。FQ-PCR具有准确快速,敏感性和特异性较高的特点,是一种具有临床应用价值的淋球菌快速定量检测方法。
Objective: To evaluate the clinical Value of Gram staining, culture and real - time fluorescent quantitative polymerase chain reation (FQ - PCR)in detection of gonococal infection in women Patients and find a fast and sensitive method to detect gonococcus.Methods: 123 urogenital specimens were obtained from patients with suspected gonorrhea. These specimens were tested by Gram stain of smear, culture and FO - PCR. Culture was considered as the "gold standard". Compared with the culture, the sensitivity, specificity positive predictive predictive value (PPV)and negative predictive value (NPV) of two detection methods were calculated. Results: The positive rate of smear detection was 76.4% and that of culture and FQ - PCR detection was 66.7%and 69.9% ,The results of paved comparison Х^2 test indicated that the difference between both of the FQ - PCR and culture were not significant ( P 〉 0.05 ). In comparison with the culture , the sensitivity, the specificity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 94.2 %, 66.7% ,87.2%, 82.8% for smear and 97.6% ,89.7% ,95.3% ,94.6% for FQ- PCR. Conculsion:The FQ- PCR detection is more accurate and costs less time than the culture detection. The FQ - PCR detection possess features of accuracy, fast, higher sensitivity and higher specificity. FQ- PCR provides a fast method which is feasible in clinical practice for detection of gonococcus.
出处
《中国民康医学》
2006年第20期762-763,共2页
Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词
淋球菌
FQ-PCR
涂片
Neisseria gonorrhea
Real- time fluorescent quantitative PCR
Ctdture
Smear.