摘要
任务结构与参数结构具有“同构性”,任务结构对参数结构“赋值”并实现设计完善;参数结构“改造”可推动设计演进,但又取决于任务之间相互依赖关系。任务结构模块化就是这样一种“改造”,但须以规则契约结构为基础,因其是任务之间纵向依赖关系的次优性预先决策。设计目的在于发现和追求价值,但须由市场契约结构为任务结构提供价值背景,而价值背景资本化为模块化任务结构提供了有效“整合”。“递归性”模块化操作不仅创造设计期权,也缩小设计“规模”和“下放”设计权限,有利于吸纳来自底层的创造力量,促进了设计规则市场的形成,并不断激励设计演进。
Task structure and parameter structure are isomorphic, the former fills in the latter to perfect designs; Transformations of parameter structure make designs evolve, but decided by interdependence between tasks. Modularization is one of transformations, but based on design rule contract structure, because it makes decisions in advance; Designs are to discover and pursue value, the market contract structure must provide value background for task structure, especially the capitalization provides effective conformity. The recursion of modular operation not only creates design options, but also reduces the scale and releases the right. These are advantageous to absorb the innovation resources.
出处
《中国工业经济》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第9期62-70,共9页
China Industrial Economics
关键词
参数结构
任务结构
契约结构
递归性
设计演进
task structure
parameter structure
contract structure
recursion
design evolution