期刊文献+

Acute interstitial edematous pancreatitis:Findings on non-enhanced MR imaging 被引量:11

Acute interstitial edematous pancreatitis:Findings on non-enhanced MR imaging
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To study the appearances of acute interstitial edematous pancreatitis (IEP) on non-enhanced MR imaging. METHODS: A total of 53 patients with IEP diagnosed by clinical features and laboratory findings were underwent MR imaging. MR imaging sequences included fast spoiled gradient echo (FSPGR) fat saturation axial T1-weighted imaging, gradient echo T1-weighted (in phase), single shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) T2-weighted, respiratory triggered (R-T) T2-weighted with fat saturation, and MR cholangiopancreatography. Using the MR severity score index, pancreatitis was graded as mild (0-2 points), moderate (3-6 points) and severe (7-10 points). RESULTS: Among the 53 patients, IEP was graded as mild in 37 patients and as moderate in 16 patients. Forty-seven of 53 (89%) patients had at least one abnormality on MR images. Pancreas was hypointense relative to liver on FSPGR T1-weighted images in 18.9% of patients, and hyperintense in 25% and 30% on SSFSE T2-weighted and R-T T2-weighted images, respectively. The prevalences of the findings of IEP on R-T T2-weighted images were, respectively, 85% for pancreatic fascial plane, 77% for left renal fascial plane, 55% for peripancreatic fat stranding, 42% for right renal fascial plane, 45% for perivascular fluid, 40% for thickened pancreatic Iobular septum and 25% for peripancreatic fluid, which were markedly higher than those on in-phase or SSFSE T2-weighted images (P 〈 0.001). CONCLUSION: IEP primarily manifests on non- enhanced MR images as thickened pancreatic fascial plane, left renal fascial plane, peripancreatic fat stranding, and peripancreatic fluid. R-T T2-weighted imaging is more sensitive than in-phase and SSFSE T2- weighted imaging for depicting IER AIM: To study the appearances of acute interstitial edematous pancreatitis (IEP) on non-enhanced MR imaging. METHODS: A total of 53 patients with IEP diagnosed by clinical features and laboratory findings were underwent MR imaging. MR imaging sequences included fast spoiled gradient echo (FSPGR) fat saturation axial T1-weighted imaging, gradient echo T1-weighted (in phase), single shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) T2-weighted, respiratory triggered (R-T) T2-weighted with fat saturation, and MR cholangiopancreatography. Using the MR severity score index, pancreatitis was graded as mild (0-2 points), moderate (3-6 points) and severe (7-10 points). RESULTS: Among the 53 patients, IEP was graded as mild in 37 patients and as moderate in 16 patients. Forty-seven of 53 (89%) patients had at least one abnormality on MR images. Pancreas was hypointense relative to liver on FSPGR T1-weighted images in 18.9% of patients, and hyperintense in 25% and 30% on SSFSE T2-weighted and R-T T2-weighted images, respectively. The prevalences of the findings of IEP on R-T T2- weighted images were, respectively, 85% for pancreatic fascial plane, 77% for left renal fascial plane, 55% for peripancreatic fat stranding, 42% for right renal fascial plane, 45% for perivascular fluid, 40% for thickened pancreatic lobular septum and 25% for peripancreatic fluid, which were markedly higher than those on in-phase or SSFSE T2-weighted images (P < 0.001).CONCLUSION: IEP primarily manifests on non-enhanced MR images as thickened pancreatic fascial plane, left renal fascial plane, peripancreatic fat stranding, and peripancreatic fluid. R-T T2-weighted imaging is more sensitive than in-phase and SSFSE T2-weighted imaging for depicting IEP.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2006年第36期5859-5865,共7页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by Key project of Science and Technology Research, Ministry of Education, China, No. 206126
关键词 PANCREAS PANCREATITIS Inflammation EDEMA Magnetic resonance 水肿 胰腺炎 CT检查 炎症
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1[1]Bradley EL 3rd,Allen K.A prospective longitudinal study of observation versus surgical intervention in the management of necrotizing pancreatitis.Am J Surg 1991; 161:19-24; discussion 24-25
  • 2[2]Bradley EL 3rd.A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis.Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis,Atlanta,Ga,September 11 through 13,1992.Arch Surg 1993; 128:586-590
  • 3[3]Balthazar EJ.Pancreatitis.In:Gore RM,Levive MS.eds.Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology.Philadelphia,Pa:W.B.Saunders Co,2000:1767-1795
  • 4[4]Balthazar EJ,Robinson DL,Megibow AJ,Ranson JH.Acute pancreatitis:value of CT in establishing prognosis.Radiology 1990; 174:331-336
  • 5[5]Morgan DE,Baron TH.Practical imaging in acute pancreatitis.Semin Gastrointest Dis 1998; 9:41-50
  • 6[6]Schmidt J,Hotz HG,Foitzik T,Ryschich E,Buhr HJ,Warshaw AL,Herfarth C,Klar E.Intravenous contrast medium aggravates the impairment of pancreatic microcirculation in necrotizing pancreatitis in the rat.Ann Surg 1995; 221:257-264
  • 7[7]McMenamin DA,Gates LK Jr.A retrospective analysis of the effect of contrast-enhanced CT on the outcome of acute pancreatitis.Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91:1384-1387
  • 8[8]Lecesne R,Taourel P,Bret PM,Atri M,Reinhold C.Acute pancreatitis:interobserver agreement and correlation of CT and MR cholangiopancreatography with outcome.Radiology 1999; 211:727-735
  • 9[9]Morgan DE,Baron TH,Smith JK,Robbin ML,Kenney PJ.Pancreatic fluid collections prior to intervention:evaluation with MR imaging compared with CT and US.Radiology 1997; 203:773-778
  • 10[10]Ward J,Chalmers AG,Guthrie AJ,Larvin M,Robinson PJ.T2weighted and dynamic enhanced MRI in acute pancreatitis:comparison with contrast enhanced CT.Clin Radiol 1997; 52:109-114

同被引文献46

引证文献11

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部