期刊文献+

弓形体IgG抗体亲和力指数在胎儿宫内感染中的临床意义 被引量:5

Clinical Evaluation of Fetus Intrauterine Infection in Immunoglobulin G Avidity Index to Toxoplasma.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】探讨弓形体(toxoplasma,TOX)IgG抗体亲和力指数,判断弓形体感染孕妇宫内感染的概率。【方法】ELISA法检测中晚期孕妇弓形体特异性抗体IgM和IgG,并对150例TOX-IgM或TOX-IgG阳性孕妇的胎儿或新生儿脐血进行TOX-IgM检测;采用尿素变性试验检测弓形体感染孕妇TOX-IgG抗体亲和力指数(avidity index,AI)。【结果】孕妇弓形体IgM抗体阳性和IgG抗体阴性58例;弓形体IgM和IgG抗体阳性22例;弓形体IgM抗体阴性和IgG抗体阳性70例。胎儿或新生儿IgM阳性44例。原发性感染宫内感染率高于继发性感染(P<0.05),活动性感染宫内感染率高于非活动性(P<0.01),AI≤30%宫内感染率高于AI>30%(P<0.01)。【结论】IgG抗体亲和力指数AI≤30%结合IgM阳性有助于提高判断弓形体宫内感染的发生率。 [Objective] To explore the action of IgG antibodies avidity index in fetus intrauterine infection of pregenant women to toxoplasmosis infection. [Methods] TOX-IgM and TOX-IgG of 150 pregnant women in second or third trimester and their newborn infants/fetus were studied by ELISA assay, and TOX-IgG antibodies avidly index of pregnant women were measured by urea denaturalization trial. [Results] In maternity, we found TOX-IgM positive and TOX-IgG positive, 58 sera; TOX-IgM positive and TOX-IgG negative, 22 sera; TOX-IgM negative and TOX-IgG nega- tive, 22 sera. In their newborn infants/fetus, we also found TOX-IgM positive, 44 sera. Intrauterine infection rate of pri- mary infection was higher than that of recurrent infection (p(0.05). Intrauterine infection rate of activity infection was higher than that of stillness infection (P(0.01). Intrauterine infection rate of AI≤30% was higher than that of AI〉30% (P〈0.01). [Conclusion] Combination of TOX-IgG antibodies avidiy index (AI≤30%) and TOX-IgM positive may be helpful for diagnosis of intrauterine infection.
出处 《中国儿童保健杂志》 CAS 2006年第5期489-491,共3页 Chinese Journal of Child Health Care
基金 陕西省科技攻关项目[2003K10-G42(3)]
关键词 弓形体 亲和力指数 宫内感染 Toxoplasma avidity index intrauterine infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1李昭荣,李牧,刘海莉,杜芳,刘明,赵娟.分娩期孕妇TORCH感染的血清学检测及临床分析[J].国外医学(妇幼保健分册),2003,14(1):3-5. 被引量:8
  • 2STAGNO S,PASS RF,CLOUD G,et al.Primary cytomegalovirs infection in pregnancy,incidence,transmission to fetus,and clinical outcome[J].JAMA,1986,256:1904-1908.
  • 3BLACKBURN NK,BESSELAAR TG,SCHOUB BD,et al.Differentiation of primary cytomegalovirus infection from reaction using the urea denaturation test for measuring antibody avidity[J].J Med Virol,1991,33:6-9.
  • 4REVELLO MG,GERNA G.Diagnosis and management of human cytomegalovirus infection in the mother,fetus,and newborn infant[J].ClinMicrobiol Rev,2002,15:680-715.
  • 5HEDMAN K,ROUSSEAU SA.Measurement of avidity of specific IgG for verification of recent primary rubella[J].J Med Virol,1989,27:288-292.
  • 6EMNAS S,KARIM A,MOHAMED KC,et al.Difficulty in dating primary infections by Toxoplasma gondii in preg nant women in Tunisia[J].Tunis Med,2006,84:85-87.
  • 7MACE M,SISSOEFF L,RUDENT A,et al.A serological testing algorithm for diagnosis of primary CMV infection in pregnant woman[J].Prenal Diagn,2004,24:861-863.
  • 8MARIA GR,GIOVANNA G.Clinical evaluation of a chemiluminescence immunoassay for determination of immunoglobulin G avidity to human cytomegalovirus[J].Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology,2004,11:801-805.
  • 9VELZING J,ROTHARTH PH,KROSE A,et al.Detection of cytomegalovirus mRNA and DNA encoding the immediate early gene in peripheral blood leukocytes form imnnmocopromised patients[J].J Med Virol,1994,42:164-169.

二级参考文献2

共引文献7

同被引文献43

  • 1侯林浦,姜英涛,高英,张萌,马旭.巨细胞病毒IgG抗体亲和指数测定的方法及临床意义[J].中华临床医学荟萃杂志,2004,1(1):14-17. 被引量:5
  • 2方峰,董永绥,魏睛,刘双又.巨细胞病毒所致婴儿肝脏损害的前瞻性研究[J].中华儿科杂志,1995,33(6):350-351. 被引量:55
  • 3程彦斌.弓形虫病实验诊断研究的进展[J].国外医学(寄生虫病分册),1996,23(5):205-208. 被引量:8
  • 4冼琼珍,蔡明福,王淑敏,顾万军.猪弓形体病的血清学调查[J].中国畜牧兽医,2006,33(11):103-104. 被引量:13
  • 5Matsui D, Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of fetal toxoplasmosis [J]. Clin Perinatol, 1994, 21: 675-675.
  • 6Berrebi A, Kobuch W, Bessieres M, et al. Termination of pregnancy for maternal toxoplasmosis[J]. Lancet, 1994, 344: 36-37.
  • 7薛纯良.弓形体病的现代治疗.中国寄生虫学与寄生虫病杂志,1991,9(2):146-146.
  • 8Efrat Rorman, Chen Stein Zamir, Irena Rilkis, et al. Congenital toxoplasmosis- prenatal aspects of Toxoplasma gondii infection [ J ]. Reproductive Toxicology , 2006,21:458- 472.
  • 9Peeling RW, Mabey D, Herring A, et al. Why do we need quality- assured diagnostic tests for sexually transmitted infections[J]. Nature Rev Microbiol, 2006,4(12 Suppl):S7 -17.
  • 10Greer L, Wendel GD. Rapid diagnostic methods in sexually transmitted infections[J]. Infect Dis Clin North Am,2008, 22(4): 601- 617.

引证文献5

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部