期刊文献+

多层螺旋CT多平面重组技术在胆总管结石中的应用 被引量:14

Assessment of CT multiplanar reformation in detection of choledocholithiasis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较多层螺旋CT增强前后横断面扫描图像和增强后MPR技术在诊断可疑低位胆道梗阻患者中差异,探讨MPR技术在胆总管结石诊断中的应用价值。方法对46例胆道扩张的患者行MSCT扫描。两位医师进行盲法阅片,以手术或胆道造影为标准,比较增强前后横断面扫描图像对胆总管结石检出的差异,评价了增强后横断面扫描图像和增强后MPR图像的价值并进行统计学处理。分析以上三者对不同类型结石的诊断差异。结果增强前后横断面扫描图像对胆总管结石诊断的敏感性分别为82.1%和89.3%,特异性分别为77.8%和88.9%,准确性分别为80.4%和89.1%。在结石诊断中,增强后MPR图像的价值显著高于增强后横断面扫描图像(P<0.05)。增强前后横断面扫描图像和增强后MPR对软组织密度结石(6/8例,8/8例,8/8例)和胆汁密度结石(0/4例,2/4例,4/4例)的检出不同。结论增强后MPR提高了低位胆道梗阻的鉴别诊断能力,有利于常规平扫或增强横断面扫描图像难以发现的胆汁密度结石及小结石的检出,且能直观显示胆道内结石的数目。 Objective To compare unenhanced CT images, enhanced CT images and multiplanar reformation (MPR) images in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Methods In a prospective series, 46 patients with suspicion of biliary obstruction were scanned using 16-slice spiral CT scanner and studied with unenhanced images, enhanced images and MPR images. Enhanced axial data were used to construct MPR images. Two radiologists evaluated the images by consensus and determined the presence of stones. We used surgery, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography as the standard of reference. Sensitivity and accuracy of unenhanced and enhanced images were calculated in diagnosis of stones. The value of enhanced images and MPR images were rated and compared using the nonparametric tests of two related samples. Results In the detection of choledocholithiasis, the sensitivity of unenhanced and enhanced images was 82. 1% and 89.3%, the specificity was 77.8% and 88.9%, the accuracy was 80.4% and 89.1% respectively. The value of MPR images was higher than that of enhanced images (P〈0.05). Unenhanced, enhanced images and MPR images were similar in the detection of dense and faint stones (16/16 cases), and were different in stones of dense with parenchyma (6/8 cases, 8/8 cases, and 8/8 cases) or dense with saline (0/4 cases, 2/4 cases, and 4,/4 cases). Conclusion In the detection of choledocholithiasis, MPR images could provide helpful information in differentiating biliary obstruction, recognizing stones of dense with saline, small stones and the number of stones.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第9期1376-1379,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 胆总管结石 胆总管疾病 体层摄影术 X线计算机 Bile duct calculi Common bile duct diseases Tomography, X-ray computed
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Baron RL,Stanley RJ,Lee JK,et al.Computed tomographic features of biliary obstruction[J].AJR,1983,140(6):1173-1178.
  • 2龚洪翰,何来昌,姜建,周莉,王敏君,王进华,王敏,纪玉强,邱春梅,肖香佐.CT低张增强扫描在胆总管壶腹部梗阻诊断中的应用[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(5):510-512. 被引量:28
  • 3王中秋,卢光明,黎介寿,李维勤.肝内外胆管及胆囊扩张程度和低位梗阻性黄疸病变的相关性[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(8):847-851. 被引量:15
  • 4Neitlich JD,Topazian M,Smith RC,et al.Detection of choledocholithiasis:comparison of unenhanced helical CT and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography[J].Radiology,1997,203(6):753-757.
  • 5Zeiberg AS,Silverman PM,Sessions RB,et al.Helical (spiral) CT of the upper airway with three-dimensional imaging:technique and clinical assessment[J].AJR,1996,166(2):293-299.
  • 6王敏,龚洪翰,肖香佐,王进华,何来昌,尹敬壁.CT与MRI在胆系结石诊断中的对比研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2003,22(5):397-400. 被引量:21
  • 7Baron RL.Diagnosing choledocholithiasis:how far can we push helical CT[J]? Radiology,1997,203(3):601-603.
  • 8Mitchell SE,Clark RA.A comparison of computed tomography and sonography in choledocholithiasis[J].AJR,1984,142(4):729-733.
  • 9Jeffrey RB,Federle MP,Laing FC,et al.Computed tomography of choledocholithiasis[J].AJR,1983,140(6):1179-1183.
  • 10Caoili EM,Paulson EK,Heyneman LE,et al.Helical CT cholangiography with three-dimensional volume rendering using an oral biliary contrast agent[J].AJR,2000,174(3):487-492.

二级参考文献23

  • 1徐峻,陆建平,汪剑,王飞,刘崎,王莉,龚建国,金爱国,曾浩.胰腺疾病的MR胰胆管成像征象的定量分析[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(6):631-635. 被引量:15
  • 2Wise RH Jr,Stanley RJ.Caricinoma of the ampulla of Vater presenting as acute pancreation.J Comput Assist Tomogr,1984,8:158-161.
  • 3Blomley MJ,Strickland NH,Jackson JE.Case report:multiple duodenal gastrin-omas demonstrated with spiral CT.Clin Radiol,1996,51:811-813.
  • 4Lim JH,Lee DH,Ko YT,et al.Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater:sonographic and CT diagnosis.Abdom Imaging,1993,18:237-241.
  • 5Kim JE,Lee JK, Lee KT,et al.The c1inicalsingnificance of common bile-duct dilatation in patients without biliary symptoms or causative lesions on ultrasonography.Endoscopy,2001,33:495-500.
  • 6Schofl R. Diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(Review). Endoscopy, 2001,33 : 147-157.
  • 7Kim M,I, Mitchell DG, lto K,et al. Biliary dilatation: differentiation of benign from malignant causes : value of adding conventional MR imaging to MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology, 2000,2 : 4 :173-181.
  • 8Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin Radiol, 2000, 55:25-35.
  • 9Jailwala J, Fogel EL, Sherman S, et al. Triple-tissue sampling at ERCP in malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endose, 2000,51:383-390.
  • 10Schlosser W, Siech M, Gorich J, et al. Common bile duct stenosis in complicated chronic pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2001,36 : 214-219.

共引文献58

同被引文献102

引证文献14

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部