期刊文献+

社会多元化与政府转型情境下的规划模式转变——浅析多伦多新型社会规划 被引量:2

A planning paradigm shift in the context of social diversity and government transformation: an analysis of Toronto alternative social planning
原文传递
导出
摘要 面对当前社会日益多元化的发展趋势,以及政府职能调整为社区发展带来的两难困境,加拿大多伦多市在反思传统社会规划模式局限性的基础上,开创性地进行了新型社会规划模式的探索,为我国城市规划领域中社会规划的发展提供了新的思路和启示。 Facing current development trends of social diversity, and the dilemma for community development as the consequence of re - adjustment of governmental roles, Toronto has promoted innovative researches on a new paradigm of alternative social planning, on the base of reviewing the limitations of traditional approaches. This paper provides new sights and revelations for the development of social planning in the field of urban planning in today' s China.
作者 刘佳燕
出处 《城市问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第6期90-94,共5页 Urban Problems
关键词 社会多元化 政府转型 新型社会规划 多伦多 social diversity government transformation alternative social planning Toronto
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Perlman R, Gurin A. Community organization and social planning. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Lnc. , 1972
  • 2Bromley R. Social Planning: Past, Present, and Future. Journal of International Development, 2003 ( 15 ) : 819 - 830
  • 3Gage T M. Social planning: a case study in the construction of knowledge in the profession of urban planning: [ doctoral dissertation]. Washington: University of Washington, 1983
  • 4Kahn A J. Theory and practice of social planning. New York:Russell Sage Foundation, 1969
  • 5Zizys T, Kosny M, Bonnell J. A review of social planning activities in the cit of Toronto. 2004
  • 6APG. Ahernative social planning: a paradigm shift - developing an inclusive, health Toronto. 2004
  • 7Friedmann J. Planning theory revisited. Abingdon: European Planning Studies, 1998(3) : 245 -253
  • 8McGrath S. Social planning: mobilizing local civil society. Plan Canada, 2000(2) : 11 - 12
  • 9Allmendinger P. Towards a post - positivist typology of planning theory. Planning theory, 2002 ( 1 ) : 77 - 99
  • 10Gleeson B, Randolph B. Social planning and disadvantage in the Sydney context. Urban Frontiers Program Issues Paper No. 9,2001

二级参考文献31

  • 1李志刚,吴缚龙,卢汉龙.当代我国大都市的社会空间分异——对上海三个社区的实证研究[J].城市规划,2004,28(6):60-67. 被引量:120
  • 2Allmendinger P. Towards A Post-Positivist Typology of Planning Theory. Planning Theory, 2002 (1): 77-99.
  • 3APG. Alternative Social Planning: a paradigm shift - developing an inclusive, health Toronto. 2004. www.ocasi.org/downloads/Altemative_Social_Planning.pdf.
  • 4Bromley R. Social Planning: past, present, and future. Journal of International Development, 2003(15): 819-830.
  • 5Brooks M P. Social Policy in Cities: toward a theory of urban social planning: [doctoral dissertation]. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 1970.
  • 6Conyers D. An Introduction to Social Planning in Third World. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 1982.
  • 7Dyckman J W. Social Planning, Social Planners, and Planned Societies. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1966, 32 (2): 66-76.
  • 8Friedmann J. Planning Theory Revisited. Abingdon: European Planning Studies, 1998(3): 245-253.
  • 9Friedmann J. Globalization and the Emerging Culture of Planning. Revised version of a paper originally prepared for UN Habitat (Nairobi), 2004.
  • 10Gage T M. Social Planning: a case study in the construction of knowledge in the profession of urban planning: [doctoral dissertation]. Washington: University of Washington, 1983.

共引文献17

同被引文献22

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部