1Goodman, R.A., & Lawless, M.W.. Technology and strategy :Conceptual models and diagnostics. New York : Oxford University Press.
2Williamson, O.E.. Markets and hierarchies :Analysis and antitrust implications. A study of the economics of internal organization. New York :The Free Press.
3Davidson,K.M.. Why acquisitions may not be the best route to innovation. The Journal of Business Strategy, 1991, (12) :50-52.
4Christensen, C.M.,& Bower,J.L.. Customer power,strategic investment ,and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 1996, (17): 197-218.
5Cooper, A.C., & Schendel, D.. Strategic responses to technological threats. Business Horizons, 1976, 19(1 ) :61-69.
6Utterback,J.M.,& Abernathty,W.J.. A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 1975, (33) :639-656.
7Teece,D.J.. Towards an economic theory of the muhiproduct firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1982, (3) :39-63.
8Eisenhardt, K.M.,& Schoonhoven, C.B.. Resource- based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 1996, (7) : 136-150.
9Eisenhardt, K.M.,& Martin ,J.A.. Dynamic capabilities :What are they?Strategic Management Journal, 2000, (21) : 1105-1121.
1C.Freeman,The Economics of Industrial Innovation,Cambridge:The MIT Press, 1982.
2Sch erer, F.M.,Innovation and growth:Schumpetenan perspectives, Cambndge,Mass: MIT Press, 1984.
3Cohen,W.M.,R.C.Levin,and D.C.Mowery, Finn size and R&D intensity:A re-examination, Journal of Industrial Economics, 1987, pp.543-563.
4Acs, Z. and D. Audretsch, Innovation and Small Firms, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 1990.
5Nooteboom, B. and R.W. Vossen, 1995, Firm Size and Efficiency in R&D Spending, in A.V, Witteloostuyrt (ed.), Market Evolution: Competition and Cooperation Across Markets and Over Time,Deventer. Klumer,pp.69-86.