法官阐明界限的理论与实证分析

The Academic and Practical Analysis of the Limit of Judge's Clarification

法官阐明的目的决定阐明适用的范围。以发现真实为目的,法官阐明可以仅适用于辩论主义和处分权主义的领域;以防止诉讼突袭为目的,则将法官阐明扩张至职权探知领域。在兼顾两个目的的前提下,法官的阐明可以分解为辩论主义领域的阐明、处分权领域的阐明、职权探知领域的阐明和法律观点的阐明。法官阐明的界限不可能由立法作出明确的规定,只能倚重判例的不断累积呈现出一个依稀可见的大致轮廓。

The purpose of the judge＇ s clarification decide the extension of judge＇ clarification. If the purpose is to discover the trueness, the judge＇ s clarification can be applied in the field of doctrine of adversary hearing and doctrine of disposition. If the purpose is to avoid the assault, the judge＇ s clarification can be extended to the field of doctrine of exofficio. Giving attention to two purposes, the judge＇ s clarification can be divided into clarification in the field of doctrine of adversary hearing, clarification in the field of doctrine of disposition, clarification in the field of doctrine of exofficio and clarification of the point of law. The limit of judge＇ s clarification is impossible to be regulated in the law, we could only depend on the prejudication to show a vague outline.