期刊文献+

双水平正压通气治疗急性心源性肺水肿 被引量:4

Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation Therapy for Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨应用双水平无创正压机械通气技术治疗急性心源性肺水肿(ACPE)的临床价值。方法将2004年7月—2006年5月收治的44例急性心源性肺水肿病人随机分为BiPAP组和面罩吸氧组。BiPAP组在常规药物治疗基础上,经鼻面罩连接BiPAP呼吸机,吸气末压力(IPAP)8cmH2O^15cmH2O、呼气末压力(EPAP)2cmH2O^5cmH2O,吸氧浓度28%~35%;面罩吸氧组在常规药物治疗的基础上单纯给予Venturi面罩吸氧。监测病人心率、血压、呼吸、指端血氧饱和度、动脉血气分析和临床变化。结果BiPAP组经无创机械通气后所有病人呼吸频率减慢,心率下降,呼吸困难缓解,治疗总有效率为100.0%。对血压无明显影响。呼吸困难开始缓解时间40min(10min^100min),明显短于对照组的150min(50min^240min)(P<0.01)。对照组在相应时间治疗有效率仅为64.7%。结论充分使用药物治疗急性心源性肺水肿基础上,合用BiPAP治疗可使肺水肿和心功能迅速改善,减少气管插管率。 Objective To evaluate lation (BiPAP) for acute bilevel positive airway pressure ventic pulmonary edema. Methods Forty-four patients (pts) were assigned to control group and BiPAP group randomly. In BiPAP group, 27 pts were linked to BiPAP by a nose - face mask accessory with conventional drug. The aspiratory pressure and expiratory pressure were 8 cmH2O- 15 cmH2O and 2 cmH2O- 5cmH2O, respectively. The oxygen density was 28% - 35 %. In control group, 17 pts were treated with traditional drug. The electrocardiography, arterial oxygen saturation heart rate and blood pressure were observed during the therapy. Results Dyspnea were relieved in all pts in BiPAP group. Both the respiratory rate and heart rate were slowed. There were no changes in blood pressure. The effective rate was 100.0% in BiPAP group and that in control group was 64.7%. Conclusion The BiPAP for acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema was superior to conventional oxygen therapy. It should be recommended for clinical use.
作者 李文华
出处 《中西医结合心脑血管病杂志》 2006年第10期852-853,共2页 Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine on Cardio-Cerebrovascular Disease
关键词 肺水肿 无创机械通气 心力衰竭 acute cardigenic pulmonary edema mechanical ventilation heart failture
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Pang D,Keenan SP Cook DJ,et al.The effect of positive airway support on mortality and need for intubation in cardiogenic pulmonary edema:A systematic review[J].Chest,1998,114 (4):1185 -1192.
  • 2Masip J,Betbese AJ,Paez,et al.Non-invasive pressure support ventilation versur conventional oxygen therapy in acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema:A randomized trial[J].Lancet,2000,356:2132.
  • 3叶绍东,张健.双水平正压通气治疗急性心源性肺水肿[J].国外医学(心血管疾病分册),2005,32(6):353-355. 被引量:17
  • 4朱蕾,戎卫海.心原性肺水肿的机械通气治疗[J].中华老年医学杂志,2002,21(4):314-315. 被引量:54
  • 5Sacchtti AD,Harris RH.Acute cardiogenic pulmonary edemna:What's the latest emergency treatment[J].Postgraduate Medicine,1998,103:145-166.
  • 6Mehta S,Tay GD,Woolard RH,et al.Randomized prospective trial of bilevel versus continuous positive airway pressure in acute pulmonary edema[J].Crit Care Med,1997,25:620-628.
  • 7Schouoter S,Erble R,Weilemanm CS,et al.Hemodynamics during PEEP ventilation in patients with severe left ventricular failure studied by transesophageal echocardiography[J].Chest,1990,97:1181 -1185.

二级参考文献15

  • 1叶任高.内科学(第5版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2000.159.
  • 2Park M, Lorenzi-Filho G, Feltrim MI, et al. Arq Bras Cardiol,2001 ,76(3) :221 -230.
  • 3Murry JF. Hosp Prac (Off Ed) ,1985,20(4) :55-66, 68.
  • 4Wigder HN, Hoffmann P, Mazzolini D, et al. Am J Emerg Med, 2001 ,19(3):179-181.
  • 5Takeda S , Takano T , Ogawa R. Anesth Analg , 1997 ,84(5) :1 091-1 096.
  • 6Kosowsky JM , Storrow AB , Carleton SC. Am J Emerg Med ,2000,18(1) :91-95.
  • 7Masip J , Betbese AJ , Paez J , et al. Lancet , 2000 , 356(9248) :2 126-2 132.
  • 8Cross CE ,Shaver JA, Wilson RJ , et al. Arch Intern Med ,1970,125(2) :248-254.
  • 9Pang D , Keenan SP , Cook DJ ,et al. Chest , 1998,114(4):1 185-1 192.
  • 10Levitt MA. J Emerg Med,2001,21(4) :363- 369.

共引文献69

同被引文献16

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部