《儒林外史》和《围城》讽刺艺术比较

A Comparison of Satiring Art Between Scholars and Fortress Besieged

《儒林外史》和《围城》是中国讽刺小说发展史上的两座高峰,本文对二者讽刺艺术不同的内涵和艺术成就进行了比较。文章认为《,儒林外史》的讽刺对象直指社会制度和社会风气《;围城》则揭示了人性的根本颓败与人类的生存困境,而将道德判断延期《。儒林外史》的讽刺采用客观呈现的叙事方法,而《围城》的讽刺则采用主观说明的叙事方法。

Scholars and Fortress Besieged both are the models of satiring fictions, which have comparable satiring methods in fictions. This paper holds that the objects of satire＇ in Scholars are social system and fations.However, Fortress Besieged has proclaimed the decadence of humanity and living predicament of human. Scholars has adopted objective narrating methods; but Fortress Besieged has adopted subjective narrating methods.