期刊文献+

基于领域复合语义的产品结构非精确匹配模型与算法 被引量:2

Inexact product structure matching algorithm based on multiplex domain semantics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 产品结构间的相似性问题是具有内部递归嵌套特性的复杂对象之间的非精确匹配问题。产品结构间的相似性不但与其组成部件的具体嵌套结构有关,而且还与每个节点相关联的属性集以及产品结构所依赖的企业特有的一套稳定的产品概念系统有关,产品概念系统提供了产品间相似的一类重要背景语义知识。构造了产品结构的属性集、产品概念系统、部件嵌套结构三元特征模型,并提出基于此三元特征的复合语义相似度计算模型。该计算模型是语义距离、属性集异同和下层结构的语义相似度复合3大组成部分的综合。分析证明了该模型可以充分、合理、全面地表达产品结构间的相似性。提出了相似度计算模型的非递归算法,分析了其执行性能,并讨论了该算法使用中的一些配套条件。 Similarity of product structures is an inexact matching problem among complex information objects with inductive structures. The similarities related not only to deductive nodes, but also to attribute set associated with each node, and specific background product concept (ontology) system belonging to enterprises. The product concept system offered a rich set of background semantics knowledge to estimate the similarity. A triple characteristics model was constructed which was composed of attribute sets of product structure, product inductive structure and product background concept system. Based on this model, a comprehensive similarity computation model based on multiplex domain semantics was constructed, which was the combination of several sub-- indicators, such as semantic distance, similarity among feature sets and similarity among inductive structures. Analysis showed that this model was a better choice to estimate the similarity among product structures. A non--recursion algorithm to realize the model was proposed, and the operation performance of the algorithm was studied, as well as the preconditions required for the algorithm to be applied in real world were also discussed.
出处 《计算机集成制造系统》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2006年第7期981-989,共9页 Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems
关键词 产品结构 领域语义 非精确匹配 描述逻辑 语义距离 product structure domain semantics inexact matching description logics semantic distance
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1董峥,徐晓飞,战德臣.基于半结构化数据的新型产品结构模式研究[J].计算机集成制造系统-CIMS,2003,9(1):15-19. 被引量:8
  • 2JOSEPH K,WILLIAM C.DAMLJessKB:a tool for reasoning with the semantic Web[A].Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference[C].Berlin,Germany:SpringerVerlag Publisher,2003.628-643.
  • 3TVERSKY T.Features of similarity[J].Psychological Review,1977,84(4):327-352.
  • 4RIPS L,SHOBEN J.Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations[J].Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,1973,12(1):1-20.
  • 5KRUMHANSL C.Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similarity data:the interrelationship between similarity and spatial density[J].Psychological Review,1978,85 (5):445-463.
  • 6WANG K,LIU H Q.Discovering association of structure from semi-structured objects[J].IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering,2000,12 (3):353-371.
  • 7JIANG J,CONRATH D.Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy[A].Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Linguistics[C].San Francisco,Cal.,USA:Morgan Kauffmann Press,1997.19-35.
  • 8RODRIGUEZ M,EGENHOFER M.Assessing semantic similarities among geospatial feature class definitions[J].Lecture Notes in Computer Science,1999,1580.189-202.
  • 9BAADER F,SATTLER U.An overview of tableau algorithms for description logics[J].Journal of Studia Logica,2001,69(1):5-40.
  • 10DAML Org.DAML Web site[EB/OL].http://www.daml.org/services,2002-03-27.

二级参考文献4

  • 1[4]ZWOL R, PETER M A G, WILSCHUT A N. Modeling and querying semi-structured data with MOA[A]. Proc .of the Workshop on Semi-Structured Data and Non-Standard Data Formats[C]. Jerusalem, Israel, 1999.
  • 2[2]W3C Recommendation 6 October 2000. Extensible markup language (XML) 1.0 (2nd Edition) [EB/OL]. http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml.
  • 3[3]SHANMUGASUNDARAM J, TUFTE K, ZHANG C,et al. Relational databases for querying XML documents: limitations and opportunities[A]. Proc.of the 25thInt'l Conf on Very Large Databases[C]. Edinburgh, Scotland, 1999. 302-314.
  • 4胡敏.企业集成环境下的BOM研究[J].计算机工程,2001,27(6):22-24. 被引量:24

共引文献7

同被引文献14

  • 1王红军,陈新,郑德涛.基于超图理论的产品族规划方法[J].中国机械工程,2005,16(13):1133-1137. 被引量:5
  • 2倪益华,顾新建,吴昭同.基于本体的企业知识管理平台的构建[J].中国机械工程,2005,16(15):1353-1357. 被引量:15
  • 3Studer R,Benjamins VR,Fensel D.Knowledge Engineering,Principles and Methods [J].Data and Knowledge Engineering, 1998,25(12) :161- 197.
  • 4Rector A.Modularisation of Domain Ontologies Implemented in Description Logic and Related Formalisms including OWL [C]//Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Capture. Sanibel Island: ACM Press, 2003:121-128.
  • 5Grau BC,Kutz O. Modular Ontology Languages Revisited [C]//IJCAI Workshop on Semantic Web for collaborative knowledge Acquisition, India: Hyderabad, 2007.
  • 6Chen Y, Chen Y, Chu H. Development of a mechanism for ontology-based product lifecycle knowledge integration [ J ].Expert Systems with Applications, 2005,36(2) : 2759-2779.
  • 7JC Arpirez, AG Perez.(onto )2 agent: An ontology-based www broker to select ontologies [C]//Proceedings of Workshop on Applications Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods, United Kingdom: Brighton, 1998:16-24.
  • 8Harmelen F, Hendler J, Horrocks I,et al.OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. World Wide Web Consortium. http://www. w3. org/tr/owl/ref.
  • 9J Lee, H Chae, CH Kim, et al.Design of product ontology architecture for collaborative enterprises [ J ] .Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,63 (2): 2300-2309.
  • 10Steven B S,Timothy W S,Soundar R T K,et al.Toward a Multi-agent Information Management Infrastructure for Product Family Planning and Mass Customization[J],International Jouranal of Mass Customisation.2005,1(1):134-155.

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部