城市房屋拆迁行政裁决的主要争议点与立法建议——以成都市区为典型的实证分析

The Main Points of Controversy and Legislative Proposals for Administrative Adjudications on Urban Housing Demolition——An Typical Empirical Analysis of Chengdu

城市房屋拆迁纠纷是当前带有某种普遍性的社会现象。城市房屋拆迁行政裁决制度是解决拆迁纠纷的重要途径。本文以成都市区近年的1 893件房屋拆迁裁决为典型实例,研究这种行政裁决制度的实际运作效果以及拆迁矛盾的主要争议点,并针对性地提出三点立法建议:一是以程序公正来保障拆迁当事人的利益均衡;二是进一步提高拆迁行政裁决的中立性;三是以法规规范的形式建立科学的房屋价格的发现机制。

Urban housing demolition dispute is a certain universal social phenomenon. Administrative adjudications system of urban housing demolition is an important way to solve the disputes. With 1,893 cases of the housing demolition adjudications of Chengdu as typical examples relocation in recent years, the essay studies the real operational results of administrative adjudication system and the major point of controversy of demolition contradictions, putting forward three proposals： First, using the procedure just to protect demolition clients＇ balanced interests; second, further enhancing the neutrality of demolition administrative adjudication ; third, establishing a discovery mechanism of scientific housing price with the form of re.clarions and standardization.