期刊文献+

红外激光治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的疗效观察 被引量:8

Improvement of diabetic peripheral neuropathy using monochromatic infrared energy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察红外激光治疗糖尿病周围神经病变的疗效。方法将74例糖尿病周围神经病变患者随机分为常规治疗组(常规组,39例)和红外激光治疗加常规治疗组(红外激光组,35例),通过对足底Semmes-Weinstein单丝(SWME)检测不敏感的位点数、密歇根神经病变评分(MNSI)的综合评定,观察患者是否有感觉功能的恢复及其他神经病变症状的改善,比较2组间疗效。结果经过12次红外激光治疗后,红外激光组患者对足底SWME(5.07级)不敏感的部位明显减少(P<0.01),密歇根神经病变评分降低(P<0.01),2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗过程中患者无皮肤损伤。结论红外激光可能是一种安全的、非药物的、非侵入性的糖尿病周围神经病变治疗方法。 Objective To observe the effect of monochromatic infrared energy(MIRE) on diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). Methods Seventy -four subjects with diabetic peripheral neuropathy who were tested by Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments ( SWM ) were randomized into 2 groups: a conventional management group and a conventional management plus MIRE group. Then the patients' sensory function and other DPN symptoms were evaluated by the SWME and the score of Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument. Results After treatments, there was a decrease (P 〈 0.01 ) in the number of the sites insensitive to SWME (grade 5.07 ) , and MNSI scores were significantly decreased ( P 〈 0.01 ). The MIRE management was more effective than conventional management, Conclusion Monochromatic infrared energy is perhaps a safe, non-pharmaceutical and non-invasive method for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
作者 刘洁 徐焱成
出处 《中华物理医学与康复杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第10期693-696,共4页 Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
关键词 红外激光 糖尿病周围神经病变 Semmes—Weinstein单丝 Monochromatic infrared energy Diabetes,peripheral neuropathy Semmes-Weinstein monofilament
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Mueller MJ. Identifying patients with diabetes mellitus who are at risk for lower extremity complications : use of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments.Phys Ther, 1996, 76: 68-71.
  • 2Dowman R, Wolpaw JR. Jendrassik menellver facilitates soleus H-reflex without change in average soleus motoneuron pool manbrane potential.Exp Neurol, 1988, 101:288-302.
  • 3Young M J, Breddy JL, Veres A, et al. The prediction of diabetic neuropathic foot ulceration using vibration perception thresholds. A prospective study. Diabetes Care, 1994, 17:557-560.
  • 4Perkins BA, Olaleye D, Zinman B, et al. Simple screening tests for peripheral neuropathy in the diabetes clinic. Diabetes Care, 2001,24:250-256.
  • 5Kamei N, Yamane K, Nakanishi S, et al. Effectiveness of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament examination for diabetic peripheral neuropathy screening. J Diabetes Complications, 2005, 19:47-53.
  • 6Moghtaderi A, Bakhshipour A, Rashidi H. Validation of Michigan neuropathy screening instrument for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2005, 5: 1-5.
  • 7Kennedy JM, Zochodne DW. Influence of experimental diabetes on the microcirculation of injured peripheral nerve: functional and morphological aspects. Diabetes, 2002, 51:2233-2240.
  • 8Franek A, Krol P, Kucharzewski M. Dose low output laser stimulation enhance the healing of crural ulceration? Some critical remarks. Med Eng Phys, 2002, 24: 607-615.
  • 9Reddy GK, Stehno-Bittel L, Enwemeka CS. Laser photostimulation accelerates wound healing in diabetes rats. Wound Repair Regen, 2001,9 : 248 -255.
  • 10Martina V, Bruno GA, Trucco F, et al. Platelet cNOS activity is reduced in patients with IDDM and NIDDM. Thromb Haemost, 1998,79:520 -522.

同被引文献51

引证文献8

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部