国际法院对国际人权法的贡献被引量：12

The Contribution of the International Court of Justice to International Human Rights Law

导出

摘要在过去的60年里,国际法院对国际人权法作出了重大的贡献。在国际人权法与国际人道法的关系方面,它认定国际人道法构成国际人权法的特别法,国际人权法在武装冲突期间并不停止适用。在国际人权公约的域外适用方面,它认定武装冲突的占领当局必须遵守相应的国际人权公约。它首次确认国际法中存在对一切的义务,并举出了一些具有对一切的义务的人权的例子,包括民族自决权、免于种族灭绝的权利、免于奴隶制的权利、免于种族歧视的权利。它还认为领事通知权是一项个人权利,而不是一项国家权利,这有利于保护个人权利。 Over the past six decades, the International Court of Justice has made considerable contributions to international human rights law. It considers international humanitarian law as lex specialis of international human rights law, the latter not ceasing to be applicable during armed conflicts, and concludes that the occupying authorities during armed conflicts should observe international human rights conventions concerned. It confirms the existence of obligations erga omnes in international law and identifies the right to self-determination of peoples, the prohibition of genocide, slavery, and racial discrimination as those obhgations. It is in favor of the contention that the right to information on consular assistance is a right of the individual, not a right of a State, which is conclusive to the protection of rights of individuals.

作者朱利江

机构地区中国政法大学国际法学院

出处《外交评论（外交学院学报）》 CSSCI 2006年第5期85-90,共6页 Foreign Affairs Review

关键词国际法院国际人权法民族自决权对一切的义务领事通知权 International Court of Justice International Human Rights Law Right to Self-determination Obligations erga omnes Right to Information on Consular Assistance

分类号 D998.2 [政治法律—国际法学] D813.4 [政治法律—国际关系]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献26

1Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons.Advisory Opinion of 8 July 1996.
2Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territor[Z].Advisory Opinion of 9 July 2004,para.106.
3Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v.Uganda)[Z].Judgment of 19 December 2005,paras.
4[奥]曼弗雷德·诺瓦克著,毕小青,孙世彦译.民权公约评注:联合国《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》[Z].北京:三联书店.
5Corfu Channel (United Kingdom v.Albania)[Z].Judgment of 9 April 1949.
6Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v.United States of America)[Z].Judgment of 27June 1986.
7Dietrich Schindler.Human Rights and Humanitarian Law:Interrelationship of the Laws[J].American University International Law Review,Vol.31,1982.
8Thomas Buergenthal.To Respect and To Ensure:State Obligations and Permissible Derogations.in Louis Henkin (ed.),The International Bill of Rights:The Covenant on Civil and Political Rights[C].Columbia University Press,1981 Theodor Meron.Extraterritoriality of Human Rights Treaties[J].American Journal of International Law,Vol 89,1995.
9Lóez Burgos v.Uruguay[Z],Human Rights Committee,6June 1979,UN Doc.A/36/40,176,§ 12.3.
10Barcelona Traction,Light and Power Company,Limited (New Application:1962) (Belgium v.Spain)[Z],Second Phase,Judgment of 5 February 1970.