期刊文献+

慢性咳嗽患者支气管激发试验结果分析与检查指导

Analysis on Results of Bronchial Provocation Test for Chronic Cough Patients and Examination Guidance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解慢性咳嗽患者组胺支气管激发试验的结果。方法对225例慢性咳嗽患者用肺功能仪测定基础肺功能及吸入不同剂量组胺后的肺功能,对患者检查前、中、后进行指导。结果225例患者支气管激发试验阳性129例(57·3%),阴性78例(34·7%),可疑阳性18例(8·0%),所有患者均顺利完成检查。结论咳嗽变异型哮喘是慢性咳嗽的常见原因,支气管激发试验是诊断咳嗽变异型哮喘的主要方法,做好试验检查指导是患者顺利完成试验,保证检查结果准确,减少试验不良反应的关键。 Objective To discuss the results of histamine bronchial provocation test for chronic cough patients and examination guidance. Methods Basic lung function and lung function after inhaling different doses of histamine were tested by using pulmonary function test apparatus in 225 patients with chronic cough. All patients were subjected to the examination guidance before, during and after the test. Results In 225 patients with chronic cough, 129 cases (57.3%) were positive, 78 cases (34.7%) were negative, and 18 cases (8.0%) were suspiciously positive for the bronchial provocation test. All the patients undertook the test smoothly. Conclusion Cough variant asthma is the common cause of the chronic cough. The bronchial provocation test is the main method to diagnose cough variant asthma. Therefore, in order to let patients in concert with the check and to guarantee the precision of the test result, the key point is to have precise examination and give correct guidance.
出处 《护理学杂志(综合版)》 2006年第11期22-23,共2页 Journal of Nursing Science
关键词 慢性咳嗽 组胺 支气管激发试验 气道高反应性 护理 chronic cough histamine bronchial provocation test airway hyperreactivity nursing care
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献44

  • 1刘镜愉.哮喘的职业性评价[J].中国工业医学杂志,1995,8(2):121-126. 被引量:6
  • 2谢灿茂 李志平.间羟胺支气管激发试验的临床价值[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,1999,22:527-527.
  • 3Bagnato GF,Gulli S,Giacobbe O, et al.Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in subjects with gastroesophageal reflux,Respiration, 2000,67:507-509.
  • 4Hospers J J, Postma DS, Rijcken B, et al. Histamine airwayhy per-responsiveness and mortality from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cohort study. ~ Lancet,2000,356(9238) :1313-1317.
  • 5Gauvreau GM,Ronnen GM,Watson RM,et al. Exercise-induced bronehoeonstriction does not cause eosinophilic airway inflammation or airway hyperresponsiveness in subjects with asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2000,162(4 Pt 1):1302-1307.
  • 6Jones PD, Hankin R, Simpson J, et ah The tolerability, safety.and success of sputum induction and combined hypertonic saline challenge in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2001, 164:1146-1149.
  • 7Sundblad BM, Malmberg P, Larsson K, et al. Comparison of airway conductance and FEV (1) as measures of airway responsiveness to methacholine. Discrimination of small differences in bronchial responsiveness with Gaw and FEV( 1 ).Clin Physiol,2001,21:673-681.
  • 8Kohlhaufl M,Brand P,Scheuch G,et al. Impulse oscillometry in healthy nonsmokers and asymptomatic smokers: effects of bronchial challenge with methacholine. J Aerosol Med,2001,14:1-12.
  • 9Law KW,Ng KK,Yuen KN,Ho CS,et al. Detecting asthma and bronchial hyperresponslveness in children. Hong Kong Med J,2000,6 : 99-104.
  • 10Cass LM, Gunawardena KA, Macmahon MM. Pulmonary function and airway responsiveness in mild to moderate asthmatics given repeated inhaled doses of zanamivir. Respir Med, 2000,94 : 166-173.

共引文献1549

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部