期刊文献+

专利权人在不对称信息下的技术授权策略选择 被引量:11

Fees versus Royalties Licensing under Asymmetric Information
原文传递
导出
摘要 过去的研究显示,在专利权人不参与市场生产的情况下,定额权利金的收益将优于单位权利金的收益。本文得出,当被授权厂商存在成本上的私人信息时,专利权人最优的授权策略,有可能变成采用单位权利金的授权方式或定额加单位权利金的混合式授权方式。 In the literature on licensing, a major finding has been that licensing by means of a fixed-fee is superior to licensing by means of a royalty of the patent holder which is itself a non-producer. Our major contribution is to explain why the royalty plus fixed-fee was used. When the firm has private information of its own cost structure, the screening cost is existence and the fixedfee could not be the best option.
出处 《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第10期44-51,共8页 Economic Research Journal
关键词 技术授权 不对称信息 专利权 Licensing Asymmetric Information Patent
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Arrow. K, 1962, "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention", in R.R. Nelson (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Incentive Activity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • 2Kamien, M. I, and Schwartz, N, 1982, Market Structure and Innovation, Cambridge University Press.
  • 3Kamien, M. I, and Tauman, Y, 1984, "The Private Value of Patent: A Game Theoretic Analysis", Journal of Economics (Supplement),4, 93-118.
  • 4Kamien, M. I, and Tauman, Y, 1986, "Fees versus Royalties and the Private Value of a Patent", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101.
  • 5Muto, S, 1993, "On Licensing Policy in Bertrand Competition", Game and Economic Behavior, 5, 257-267.
  • 6Rostoker, M, 1984, "A Survey of Corporate Licensing", IDEA, 24, 59-92.
  • 7Wang. X. H, 1998, "Fee versus Royalty Licensing in a Cournot Duopoly Model", Economics Letters, 60, 55-62.
  • 8Wang, X. H, 2002, "Fee versus Royalty Licensing in a Differentiated Cournot Duopoly", Journal of Economics and Business, 54.

同被引文献83

引证文献11

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部