无权代理中的拟制追认效果述评

On the Legal Effect of Fictitious Ratification of Unauthorized Agency

在法律规范相关联系中可能出现并存式的法律竞合与择一式的法律竞合,后者竞合冲突需要通过法律的解释进行厘清。其解释技术的前提是关于各类法律包括司法解释等的位阶性标准问题(位阶可能决定法律之功效存在与高低等),然而在司法解释以及相关法律的适用上却经常被忽视。无权代理拟制追认的竞合规定的处理方式以及解释技术方法,需要考量法律原则与学说的演绎,同时借刑法相关法规竞合学说理论的民刑一体化构想为补充,以期达到为实践“惯用”的法律解释与适用方式在法理与实践上提供正名。

There are conflicting rules of coexisting and selecting in the relations of legal rules, the latter the legal conflicts shall be cleared up through the interpretation of law. The precondition of the interpreting skills is the standard of ranking about legal rides including the judicial interpretation （the ranking may decide the application and fitness of the legal rules）, but it is often ignored in the judicial interpretation as well as the application and fitness of related rules. The methods of handling and interpreting the conflicting rules of fictitious ratification of unauthorized agency demand to have the deduction of the legal rules and hypothesis examined. Taking the idea of integration of civil law and criminal law as supplement, we are trying to supply the rectification for the judicial interpretation and the application and fitness of related laws in usual theory and practice.