期刊文献+

黄土高原向阳沟流域水土保持措施效益分析 被引量:3

Effect of Soil and Water Conservation Measurements in the Xiangyanggou Watershed
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在ArcGIS软件的辅助下,根据不同坡度的土地利用对土壤侵蚀的影响,将向阳沟流域划分了5个坡度等级单元,利用通用土壤流失方程(USLE)对流域现有水土保持措施下不同坡度等级单元侵蚀量进行了估算,并与治理前土壤侵蚀量进行对比分析。结果表明,实施水土保持措施后,水土流失有了极大的改善,水保效益较为可观,但区域仍属中度侵蚀,25°~35°坡度等级单元对流域土壤侵蚀量的贡献最大,其次为15°~25°和>35°等级单元。根据不同坡度等级单元的水土流失侵蚀模数估算结果分析,结合现有水土保持措施,提出了今后进一步治理的的几点建议。 In terms of the impact of different land uses on soil erosion, the Xiangyanggou watershed was divided into five slope grade units with the aid of ArcGIS. Soil erosion in the units under the conditions of existed soil and water conservation measures was estimated using the universal soil loss equation, and was then contrasted to the case before adopting the measures. Results show that soil and water loss has been greatly controlled, and soil and water conservation measures have evidently plaid a relatively great role. However, the watershed is still suffering from medium erosion, and the 25° - 35° slope grade unit contributes most of soil loss, followed by the 15° - 25° and 〉35° slope grade units. Based on the analysis of estimated modulus for different slope grade units, suggestions for further soil erosion control are presented in combination with existed soil and water conservation measures.
出处 《水土保持通报》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第5期86-88,93,共4页 Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation
基金 陕西省教育厅省级重点实验室重点科研计划项目(05JS35) 国家自然科学基金委员会与黄河水利委员会联合资助基金项目(50479067)
关键词 ULSE 土壤侵蚀量 水土保持措施 向阳沟流域 universal soil loss equation soil erosion soil and water conservation measures Xiangyanggou watershed
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献21

  • 1史学正,于东升,吕喜玺.用人工模拟降雨仪研究我国亚热带土壤的可蚀性[J].水土保持学报,1995,9(3):38-42. 被引量:40
  • 2王礼先,水土保持学报,1992年,6卷,2期,25页
  • 3福建省土壤普查办公室.福建土壤[M].福州:福建科学技术出版社,1991.232-237.
  • 4黄金良.[D].厦门:厦门大学,2004.
  • 5Walsh S J. Geographic information system for natural resource management [J]. Soil and water conservation,1985, 40:202-205.
  • 6Christopher Cox,Chandra M. Application of geographic information systems in watershed management planning in St[J].Lucia. Computers and Electronics in Agricuture, 1998,20: 229- 250.
  • 7Renschler C S, Mannaerts C, Diekkruger B. Evaluating spatial and temporal variability in soil erosion risk-rainfall erosivity and soil loss ratios in Andalusia, Spain[J]. Catena, 1999,34 : 209- 225.
  • 8Sivertun A, Prange L. Non-point source critical area analysis in the Gisselo Watershed using GIS[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2003,18: 887- 898.
  • 9Shi Z H, Cai C F, Ding S W, et al. Soil conservation planning at the small watershed level using RUSLE with GIS: a case study in the Three Gorge Area of China[J]. Catena, 2004,55: 33- 48.
  • 10Lufafa A,Tenywa M M, Isabirye M, et al. Prediction of soil erosion in a lake victoria basin catchment using a GIS-based universal soil loss model[J]. Agricultural Systems, 2003,76: 883- 894.

共引文献881

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部