期刊文献+

农业水价格补贴方式选择的经济学分析 被引量:17

Economic Analysis of Different Choice of Agricultural Water Price Subsidies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从经济学的角度,对不同的农业水价补贴方式进行了分析和比较:暗补是低效的,明补是有效的补贴方式;带有数量限制的暗补兼顾了两类用水群体的利益,虽比单纯的明补低效,但这种补贴对全社会来说是一种帕累托改进。国内外的经验表明,农业水价的补贴由暗补变为明补是一种必然趋势,在这种转变的过渡时期,可以实行带有数量限制的暗补。 Since agricuhttral water is vilnerable products, the government must subsidize it to achieve certain political and economic goals. From an economic view, we analyzed and compared different means of agricultttral water price subsidies. Hidden subsidies is low efficient, and clear - sighted subsidies is high efficient. Though hidden subsidies with quantity limit is lower efficient than clear - sighted subsidies, it is a Pareto improvement to the whole society because it improved welfare of both kind of water using colony. It is clear showed that it is a inevitable trend for the change form hidden subsidies to clear- sighted subsidies, and hidden subsidies with quantity limit is preferred during the interim.
出处 《山西财经大学学报》 CSSCI 2006年第5期81-85,共5页 Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目<中国农业节水灌溉市场的有效性及政策绩效评价研究>(批准号为04CZZ015) 中国博士后基金资助项目<中国农村非营利组织运行绩效及可持续发展的理论与实证研究>(中博基[2004]13号)
关键词 农业水价 水价补贴 明补 暗补 agricultural water price water subsidies clear- sighted subsidies hidden subsidies
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献4

共引文献13

同被引文献230

引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部