期刊文献+

关于历史制度主义 被引量:7

On Historical Institutionalism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 历史制度主义认为历史是克服人类理性局限性的一个主要途径,他们以历史为手段,从各国历史发展和比较的过程中去探求制度的起源和变迁的不同过程,同时注重以制度为核心来考察历史、分析历史,重新确立了国家在政治发展中的核心地位。历史制度主义强调政治制度对公共政策和政治后果的重要作用,又特别强调政治变量之间的排列方式对政治后果的重大影响。作为新制度主义的一个重要流派,历史制度主义开辟了政治科学研究的新空间,也存在制度涵义的界定过于宽泛、分析问题具有在时空上的滞后性等缺陷和不足。 Historical institutionalism holds that history is an important way to overcome the limitations of human nature. By a historical approach, it has re - established the kernel status of the State in political development, through exploring the origin and vicissitude of the Institution from the perspective of the development of different countries and of a comparison among them, and, at the same time, concerning itself with the Institution as the core in the examination and analysis of history. It not only emphasizes the important effect of political institutions on public policies and political consequences, but, notably, emphasizes the great influence that the arrangement of political variables bears. As an important school of new institutionalism, the historical institutionalism has widened the scope of the research on politics, despite its shortcomings such as defining the term "system" too broadly, as well as its spatial and temporal retardation in analysis.
作者 杨福禄
出处 《山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 北大核心 2006年第4期8-12,共5页 Journal of Shandong Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词 政治学 新制度主义 历史制度主义 political science new institutionalism historical institutionalism
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1[1]James G· March & Johan P· Olsen.The new Institutionalism:Organizational Factors In Political life.American Political Science Review,1984.
  • 2彼得.豪尔,罗斯玛丽.泰勒,何俊智.政治科学与三个新制度主义[J].经济社会体制比较,2003(5):20-29. 被引量:224
  • 3[3]Guy Peter.Institutional Theory In Political Science:The" New Institutionalism",Continuum,London and New York,2000.
  • 4[4]Sven Steinmo,Kathleen Thelen,Frank Longstreth.Structuring Politicals:Historical Institutionalism In Comparative Analysis,Combridge:combridge University Press,1994.
  • 5[5]P· Evans,etc,Bring the state back in,Combridge:Combridge University Press,1985.
  • 6[6]Paul Pierson,Increasing Return,Path Dependence,and the study of politics,American Political Science Review,Vol.94,No.2,June 2000.
  • 7何俊志.结构、历史与行为——历史制度主义的分析范式[J].国外社会科学,2002(5):25-33. 被引量:272

二级参考文献19

  • 1彭勃.近年来国外政治学研究现状及启示[J].政治学研究,2000(4):82-94. 被引量:5
  • 2Koelble,Thomas A.,1995,The New Institutionalism in Political Science and Sociology,in Comparative Politics,Vol.27,No.2.
  • 3Katzenstein,Peter J.,1978,Between Power and Plenty:Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial State,Madison University of Wisconsin Press,p.298.
  • 4Immergut.Ellen M.,1992,The rule of the game:the logic of health policy-making in France,Switzerland and Sweden.
  • 5[法]路易·阿尔都塞,艾蒂安·巴里巴尔,2001年,<读<资本论>>,中央编译出版社.
  • 6March,James G.and Olson,P.,1989,Rediscovering Institutions:The Organizational Basis of Politics,New York,The Free Press.
  • 7Immergut,Ellen M.,1998,The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism,Politics & Society,Vol.26,No.1,March.
  • 8Weir,Margaret,1989,Ideas and Politics:The acceptance of keynesianism in Britain and the United States,in Hall,Peter A.et.,The Political Power of Economics Ideas,Princeton,Princeton University Press.
  • 9Pierson,Paul,2000,Increasing Returns,Path Dependence,and the Study of Politics,American Political Science Review,Vol.94,No.2.
  • 10Alley,Blind,2001,New Institutionalist Explanations for Institutional Change:A Note of Caution,Politics,Vol.21(2).

共引文献449

同被引文献36

  • 1汪利兵,徐洁.英国RAE大学科研评估制度及其对大学科研拨款的影响[J].高等教育研究,2005,26(12):93-97. 被引量:25
  • 2赵绘宇.欧盟环境法中的循环经济趋势谈[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,14(1):42-46. 被引量:10
  • 3Miranda Schreurs,Robert Percival.环境危机管理经验研究[J].环境科学研究,2006,19(B11):133-142. 被引量:5
  • 4Mary Henkel.The Modernisation of Research Evaluation:The Case of the UK[J].Higher Education,1999,(1):105-122.
  • 5Keiko Yokoyama.The Effect of the Research Assessment Exercise on Organisational Culture in English Universities:Collegiality versus Managerialism[J].Tert Educ Manag,2006,(12):11-322.
  • 6Henk F.Moed.UK Research Assessment Exercises:Informed Judgments on Research Quality Or Quantity?[J].Scientometrics,2008,(1):153-161.
  • 7Ameen Ali Talib.Simulations of the Submission Decision in the Research Assessment Exercise:the"Who"and"Where"Decision[J].Education Economics,1999,(1):39-51.
  • 8Stephen Sharp.The Research Assessment Exercises 1992-2001:Patterns across Time and Subjects[J].Studies in Higher Education,2004,(2):201-218.
  • 9Peter A.Hall,Rosemary C.R.Taylor.Political Science and The Three New Institutionalism[J].Political Studies,1996,(XLIV):936-957.
  • 10Evidence Ltd."Maintaining research excellence and volume"[R].The Funding Councils and Universiti -es UK,2002.

引证文献7

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部