期刊文献+

考试作弊处罚的正当程序研析 被引量:1

Research on the right procedure in the punishment of test cheats
下载PDF
导出
摘要 不断发生的大学生因考试舞弊而受到严厉处罚,继而把学校告上法庭,高校在处罚作弊学生时由于程序瑕疵而败诉,昭示了校园领域正当程序缺位问题。本文通过透视高校学生考试作弊处罚对正当法律程序的要求,明确提出完善惩罚学生考试作弊的对策与建议:设立专门的申诉机构和听证机构;尽早出台全国统一的《考试法》;处罚时应遵循正当法律程序,尊重和保障学生之合法权益。 Nowadays, some college students are punished severely by their colleges for test cheating and then these students appeal their colleges to the court. As a result, these colleges often lose a lawsuit for it because there are some slight defects in this punishment procedure. It is clear that there is a vacancy of right procedure in this punishment. This article , through the requirement of right legal procedure of punishing test cribbers , proposes some explicit suggestions : (1) setting up special organizations of appealing and hearing of witnesses; (2) appearing a national Test Law as soon as possible; (3) Colleges should follow a right legal procedure when punishing test cribbers so as to protect and respect the students' legal rights and interests.
作者 谢文俊
机构地区 惠州学院政法系
出处 《十堰职业技术学院学报》 2006年第5期28-30,共3页 Journal of Shiyan Technical Institute
关键词 考试作弊 听证 正当程序 处罚 合法权益 高校 《考试法》 examination fraud hearing of witnesses right procedure
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献26

  • 1季卫东.程序比较论[J].比较法研究,1993,7(1):1-46. 被引量:732
  • 2罗豪才.行政法学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999..
  • 3吴庚.行政法之理论与实践[M].台湾三民书局,1996:194.
  • 4John Rawls.A Theory of Justice,1971.
  • 5Lawrence M Friedman.A History of American Law,1985.
  • 6Gunther Teubner."Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law"Law and Society Review,1983.
  • 7MilsomSF.
  • 8Michael D.Bayles.Procedural Justice, Allocating to Individuals,1990.
  • 9J.Habermas.The Theory of Communicative Action,1987.
  • 10O. F. Robinsom and others.An Introduction to European Legal History,1985.

共引文献851

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部