期刊文献+

英汉有定性范畴比较研究

A comparative study of the category of definiteness
下载PDF
导出
摘要 首先探讨了英语动词的时态表示时间有定性和动词情状类型制约有定性的规律,研究了英语句法结构有定性范畴;接着通过剖析汉语有定性结构成分的语义特征,研究了汉语的语义内容的有定性;对比了英、汉两种语言以"有定性"范畴为轴心连接句子、联系语义和语法的规律。最后指出,"有定/无定"意义受到语境赋义的制约,以人的认知为准。 The present paper makes a comparative analysis of the category of definiteness between the Chinese and English language based on their different language features. It researches the English category of definiteness through sentence structure, probing into the regular pattern which governs the category of definiteness when the English tense indicates the definiteness of time and the situation type of the verb regulates definiteness. On the other hand, it studies the Chinese category of definiteness semantically through the analysis of semantic characteristics of the structural element indicating the definiteness. Furthermore, it studies comparatively the regular laws between Chinese and English which link the sentence structure and relate semantic and syntax based on the category of definiteness. The authors finally point out that "the definiteness/indefiniteness" is affected by the context and determined by people's cognition.
机构地区 长沙学院外语系
出处 《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》 2006年第5期642-646,共5页 Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
关键词 范畴 有定 无定 话题 情状 category definiteness indefiniteness topic situation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1C.Lyons,王欣.《有定性》评述[J].当代语言学,2003,5(1):78-81. 被引量:6
  • 2[2]Randolph Quirk.Comprehensive grammar of the english language[M].London and New York:Longman Group Ltd,1985.
  • 3[3]John Lyons.Linguistic semantics:An Introduction[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2000.
  • 4[4]徐通镪.基础语言学教程[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001.
  • 5[5]石毓智.语法的形式和理拒[M].南昌:江西教育出版社,2001.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Clark , H. H. & C. R. Marshall. 1981. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Elements of discourse understanding, ed. A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber and I. A. Sag, 10-63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 2Hawkins, J. A. 1974. Definiteness and indefiniteness. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
  • 3Hawkins, J. A.1978. Definiteness and indefiniteness: a study in reference and grammaticality prediction. London:Croom Helm.
  • 4Hawkins, J. A.1991. On (in) definite articles : implicatures and (un) grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics 27:405 -42.
  • 5Heim, I. R. 1989. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. New York: Garland.
  • 6Kempson, R. M. 1975. Presupposition and the delimitation of semantics. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 7Lyons, J. 1975. Deixis as the source of reference. In Formal semantics of natural language, ed. E. L. Keenan, 61-83. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 8Lyons, J.1977. Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 9Milsark, G. L. 1977. Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis. 3 : 1 - 29.
  • 10Safir, K. J. 1985. Syntactic chains. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

共引文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部