摘要
传统法理学理论仅将静态的法律关系内容(仅利、义务或者权力)作为它们的基石范畴,忽视了法律行为在法理学中的应有地位。私法程序理论揭示了程序在私法中的普遍存在及其重要功能,证明了程序不仅仅是公法的“专利”。“程序”应当与“权利”一起作为法理学的基石范畴,构建以权利一程序关系为基本架构的法理学范畴逻辑体系,以便从法理学的层面消除重实体轻程序等流弊。
Taking static contents of legal relationship (right, obligation or power) as their footstone category only, traditional Jurisprudential theories have dismissed the legal status owing to action. The procedure theory of private law discloses that procedures exist prevalently and play important roles in private law, and proves that procedures are not just the "patent" of the public law. Therefore, "procedure" should be used as one of the footstone categories of Jurisprudence together with "right" so as to establish the legal category system with right - procedure as its footstone categories, and to dissolve drawbacks such as "attach importance to substantive, not to procedure" at the jurisprudential level.
出处
《法制与社会发展》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第6期66-72,共7页
Law and Social Development
基金
浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题"交易成本的程序控制"(C16CGZF25YBX)。
关键词
法理学
基石范畴
权利
程序
jurisprudence
footstone category system
right
procedure