期刊文献+

解读安东尼·D·史密斯相关著述中的几个关键性术语 被引量:2

解读安东尼·D·史密斯相关著述中 的几个关键性术语
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文重点介绍和解读安东尼·D·史密斯相关著述中的几个关键性术语,以便于国内读者和研究者更好地把握当代西方民族与民族主义理论中的一些基本概念。首先,史密斯认为“民族”和“族群”都是某种人们共同体,但后者通常没有政治目标,在很多情况下没有公共文化,甚至没有疆域空间。在史密斯以及目前西方学界的研究中,一般是从“民族”和“族群”两个层面来剖析人类共同体的演进及其与民族主义之间的关系。其次,针对民族与国家很少完全重合的实际情况,史密斯用“民族的国家”(nationalstate)取代“民族-国家”(nation-state)。第三,史密斯提出民族主义是一种“政治的宗教”,而民族主义的“神圣事物”就是“民族”(nation)本身,其“神圣性”表现为四个方面共同体、领土、历史和命运。即使在全球化的作用下,民族主义也不会轻易退出历史舞台。 The article mainly introduces and analyses some key terms in A. D. Smith's works to help Chinese readers grasp the basic concepts in the study of nation and nationalism in the West. Firstly, A. D. Smith holds that "nation" and "ethnic group" are all human communities with the latter usually lacking a political goal, a shared culture and even a territorial dimension. Generally speaking, A. D. Smith and other contemporary scholars in the West are inclined to diagnose the relations between the evolvement of human community and nationalism in terms of "nation" and "ethnic group". Secondly, concerning the fact that the concept of nation seldom comes across the concept of state completely, A. D. Smith prefers "national state" to "nation - state". Thirdly, A. D. Smith argues that nationalism is a kind of "political religion", and "the sacred thing" about it is "nation" itself. The sacredness of nationalism lies in human community, territory, history and destiny, and will hardly fade out of history even in the background of globalization.
作者 叶江
出处 《世界民族》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第5期1-8,共8页 Journal of World Peoples Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Anthony D.Smith,Nationalism,Polity Press,2004,p.vii,7,10.
  • 2斯大林.《马克思主义和民族问题》[A]..《斯大林全集》(第2卷)[C].人民出版社,1953年.第294页.
  • 3Benedict Anderson,Imagined Communities:Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism,2^nd ed.London,Verso,1991,p.6.
  • 4Anthony D.Smith,Nationalism:Theory,Ideology,History,Polity Press,2004,p.13,43,17,35,146.
  • 5郝时远.《斯大林民族定义及其理论来源》.王建娥,陈建樾等.《族际政治与现代民族国家》,社会科学文献出版社,2004年,第77页.
  • 6Anthony D.Smith,Myths and Memories of the Nation,Oxford University Press,1999,p.105.
  • 7阮西湖.民族,还是“族群”——释ethnic group一词的涵义[J].广西民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,26(3):108-111. 被引量:23
  • 8列宁.《卡尔·马克思》.《列宁选集》第2卷,人民出版社,1960年版,第600页.
  • 9Walker Connor,"Nation-building or Nation-destroying?",in World Politics,ⅩⅩⅣ,3:319-355.
  • 10Immanuel Wallerstein,"States? Sovereignty? The Dilemmas of Capitalists in an Age of Transition",in David A.Smith etc.(eds.),State and Sovereignty in the Global Economy,Routledge,1999,p.22.

共引文献34

同被引文献27

  • 1范文澜.试论中国自秦汉时成为统一国家的原因[J].历史研究,1954(3):15-25. 被引量:61
  • 2Jessica Harriden, Making a name for themselves: Karen identity and the politicization of ethnicity in Burma, The Journal of Burma Studies, Vol. 17, 2002, p. 110.
  • 3Jessica Harriden, Making a name for themselves: Karen identity and the politicization of ethnicity in Burma, The Journal of Burma Studies, Vol. 17, 2002, p. 119.
  • 4徐鸿馨.《缅甸之族群冲突:克伦族个案研究》,台湾淡江大学硕士论文,2001年第78页.
  • 5Jessica Harriden, Making a name for themselves: Karen identity and the politicization of ethnicity in Burma, The Journal of Burma Studies, Vol. 17, 2002, p. 106.
  • 6[前苏联]瓦西里耶夫著 陈鹏译.《缅甸的民族问题》[J].民族译丛,1991,.
  • 7[缅甸]《劳动人民报》1970年9月20日.
  • 8Jessica Harriden, Making a name for themselves: Karen identity and the politicization of ethnicity in Burma, The Journal of Burma Studies, Vol. 17, 2002, p. 133.
  • 9Ananda Rajah, A ' nation of intent' in Burma: Karen ethno - nationalism, nationalism and narrations of nation, The Pacific Review, Vol. 15, No. 4, 2002, pp. 519, 521.
  • 10David I. Steinberg, " Constitutional and political bases of minority insurrections in Burma", in Lim Joo - jock & Vani S. eds. , Armed Separatism in Southeast Asia, Institute of Southeast Asian Singapore, 1984, p. 57.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部