1[1]Goldman S,Zadina K,Moritz T,et al.Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery:results from a department of veterans affairs cooperative study.J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,44:2149-2156.
2[2]Heil SG,De Vriese AS,Kluijtmans LA,et al.The role of hyperhomocysteinemia in nitric oxide (NO) and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF)-mediated vasodilatation.Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand),2004,50:911-916.
3[3]Sainani GS,Maru VG,Mehra AP.Role of endothelin-1 in genesis of coronary artery disease.Indian Heart J,2005,57:121-127.
4[4]Fang L,Wei H,Mak KH,et al.Markers of low-grade inflammation and soluble cell adhesion molecules in Chinese patients with coronary artery disease.Can J Cardiol,2004,20:1433-1438.
5[5]Wei H,Fang L,Chow dhury SH,et al.Platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 gene polymorphism and its soluble level are associated with severe coronary artery stenosis in Chinese Singaporean.Clin Biochem,2004,37:1091-1097.
6[6]Vallely MP,Bannon PG,Hughes CF,et al.Endothelial expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 is suppressed by postbypass plasma containing increased soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2002,124:758-767.
7[7]Friedl R,Li J,Schumacher B,et al.Intimal hyperplasia and expression of transforming growth factor-betal in saphenous veins and internal mammary arteries before coronary artery surgery.Ann Thorac Surg,2004,78:1312-1318.
8[8]Hinagata JI,Kakutani M,Fujii T,et al.Oxidized LDL receptor LOX-1 is involved in neointimal hyperplasia after balloon arterial injury in a rat model.Cardiovasc Res,2005,21[Epub ahead of print].
9[9]Parolari A,Mussoni L,Frigerio M,et al.Increased prothrombotic state lasting as long as one month after on-pump and offpump coronary surgery.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,2005,130:303-308.
3Reed JF 3rd. Leg wound infections following greater saphenous vein harvesting: minimally invasive vein harvesting versus con- ventional vein harvesting. Int J Extrem Wounds, 2008,7 : 210 - 219.
4Deppe AC, Liakopoulos O J, Choi YH, et al. Endoscopic vein harvesting for coronary arlcry bypass grafting: a systematic review with meta-analysis of 27 789 patients. J Surg Res,2013,180: 114-124.
5Cheng D, Allen K, Cohn W, et al. Endoscopic vascular harvest in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trims and controlled trims. Innovations(Philadelphia, Pa) ,2005,1:61-74.
6Alrawi SJ, Balaya F, Raju R, et al. A comparative study of en- dothelial cell injury during open and endoscopic saphenectomy: an electron microscopic evaluation. Heart Surg Forum,2001,4: 120-127.
7Nezafati MH, Nezafati P, Amoueian S, et al. Immunohistochem- istry comparing endoscopic vein harvesting vs. open vein harvest- ing on saphenous vein eudothelium. J Cardiothorac Surg,2014,9: 101.
8Au WK, Chiu SW, Sun MP, et al. Improved leg wound healing with endoscopic saphenous vein harvest in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a prospective randomized study in Asian popula- tion. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2008,23 : 633-637.
9Krishnamoorthy B, Critchley WR, Glover AT, et al. A random- ized study comparing three groups of vein harvesting methods for coronary artery bypass grafting: endoscopic harvest versus stan- dard bridging and open techniques. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2012,15 : 224-228.
10Allen KB, Heimansohn DA, Robison RJ, et al. Risk factors for leg wound complications following endoscopic versus traditional saphenous vein harvesting. Heart Surg Forum, 2000,3:325-330.
