期刊文献+

生化指标检测在腹水鉴别诊断中的评价 被引量:5

Routine clinical biochemical tests of ascites in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign ascites
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价腹水生化指标在腹水鉴别中的诊断效率,探讨单项及组合指标的临床应用价值。方法:测定64例腹水患者,其中恶性腹水者30例,非恶性腹水者34例,用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)评价腹水总蛋白(TP)、乳酸脱氢酶(LD)、胆固醇(TC)、白蛋白(ALB)、纤维连接蛋白(FN)、糖(GLU)等,指标敏感度和特异度,分析联合检测的诊断效率。结果:单项检测TP、LD、TC、ALB、FN、GLU的敏感度分别为96.7%、90.0%、90.0%、93.3%、90.0%、73.3%;特异度为85.3%、88.2%、88.2%、82.4%、88.2%、79.4%;ROC曲线下面积为0.93、0.93、0.92、0.89、0.85、0.80。2项联合检测(FN与LD或LD与TC)的敏感度、特异度、阳性似然比、诊断准确度分别为89.3%、90%、9.5、90.6%。而FN、TC、LD与TP组合敏感度和特异度分别为86.7%和93.3%,但阳性似然比却都降为7.7。3项联合检测(FN、LD、TC)敏感度、特异度、阳性似然比、诊断准确度分别为83.3%、85.3%、13.8、91.5%。结论:检测腹水TP、LD、TC、ALB和FN对于鉴别良恶性腹水具一定诊断价值,多项指标联合检测,尤其FN、LD、TC3项指标联合,可明显提高诊断效率。 Objective To study the routine clinical biochemical tests of ascites in the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign ascites, and to discuss the diagnostic characteristics of each single test and multi-test. Methods Ascitic total protein (TP), albumin (ALB), lactose dehydrogenase (LD), fibronectin (FN), total cholesterol (TC) and glucose (GLU) were determined in 64 patients, including 34 benign and 30 malignant. The sensitivity and the specificity of each test was evaluated by relative operating characteristics curve (ROC curve), positive likelihood ratio (+LR) and negative likelihood ratio (-LR). Results The areas under various ROC curve were 0.93 tiP), 0.92 (LD), 0.92 (TC), 0.89 (ALB), 0.84(FN)) and 0.80 (GLU), respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity was 96.7(TP), 90(LD), 90(TC), 93.3(ALB), 90(FN) and 73.3(GLU), respectively, while the specificity was 85.3(TP), 88.2(LD), 88.2(TC), 82.4(ALB), 88.2(FN) and 79.4(GLU), respectively. When two tests were used simultaneously, the sensitivity, specificity, +LR and diagnostic accuracy of Fn with LD or LD with TC were 89.3% ,90% ,9.5 and 90.6%, respectively. When Fn, LC with LD or TP, TC with TP were used simultaneously, their sensitivity and the specificity were 86.7% and 90% respectively; however, the +LR all fell to 7.7. When Fn, LD and TC were combined, the diagnostic sensitivity was 83.3%, the specificity was 85.3%, the positive likelihood ratio was 13.8 and the diagnostic accuracy was 91.5%. Conclusions TP, LD, TC, ALB and FN can be used for differential diagnosis between malignant and benign ascites. The application of multi-test, especially, the combination of Fn, LD and TC, could obviously elevate the diagnostic accuracy.
出处 《诊断学理论与实践》 2006年第5期429-432,共4页 Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice
关键词 腹水 生化指标 鉴别诊断 Ascites Biochemical test Differential diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[1]Siddiqui RA,Kochhar R,Singh V,et al.Evaluation of fibronectin as a marker of malignant ascites[J].J Gastroenterol Hepatol,1992,7(2):161-164.
  • 2[2]Pankov R,Yamada KM.Fibronectin at a glance[J].J Cell Sci,2002,115(Pt 20):3861-3863.
  • 3[3]Hynes RO,Yamada KM.Fibronectins:multifunctional modular glucoproteins[J].J Cell Biol,1982,9(5):369-377.
  • 4[4]Prieto M,Gomez-Lechon M J,Hoyos M,et al.Diagnosis of malignant ascites.Comparison of ascitic fibronectin,cholesterol,and serum-ascites albumin difference[J].Dig Dis Sci,1988,33(7):833-838.
  • 5[5]Sevinc A,Sari R,Fadillioglu E,et al.The utility of lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme pattern in the diagnostic evaluation of malignant and nonmalignant ascites[J].J Natl Med Assoc,2005,97(1):79-84.
  • 6[6]Gerbes AL,Jungst D,Xie YN,et al.Ascitic fluid analysis for the differentiation of malignancy-related and nonmalignant ascites.Proposal of a diagnostic sequence[J].Cancer,1991,68(8):1808-1814.
  • 7[7]Castaldo G,Oriani G,Cimino L,et al.Total discrimination of peritoneal malignant ascites from cirrhosis-and hepatocarcinoma-associated ascites by assays of ascitic cholesterol and lactate dehydrogenase[J].Clin Chem,1994,40(3):478-483.
  • 8陈卫中,倪宗瓒,潘晓平,刘元元,夏彦.用ROC曲线确定最佳临界点和可疑值范围[J].现代预防医学,2005,32(7):729-731. 被引量:208
  • 9邹莉玲,沈其君,陈启光,王文梅.指标联合的ROC曲线分析[J].中国卫生统计,2003,20(5):279-280. 被引量:15
  • 10熊立凡,王鸿利.循证检验医学能为临床医学提供决策和证据[J].中国实验诊断学,2004,8(1):82-85. 被引量:18

二级参考文献16

  • 1Wieand HS, Gail MH, james BR, et al. A family of nonparametric statistics for comparing diagnostic markers with paired or unpaired data.Biometrika. 1989.76 : 585-592.
  • 2John QS, Jun SL. Linear combinations of multiple diagnostic markers.Journal of the American statistical association. 1993.88 (424): 1350- 1355.
  • 3Bamber D. The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph . Journal of mathematical psychology, 1975, 12: 387-415.
  • 4Cox DR. Snell EJ, Analysis of binary data. 2nd ed London:Chapman & Hall, 1989.
  • 5Gregory Mark. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: Fundamental Evaluation Tool in Clinical Medicine [ J ]. Clin Chem,1993, 30 (4): 561 - 567.
  • 6Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiveroperating characteristic (ROC) curve [J]. Radiology, 1982,143 (4): 29.
  • 7Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of dianostic system [J]. Science,1988, 240 (4622): 1285.
  • 8Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC)curve [J]. Radiology, 1982: 29-36.
  • 9姜永茂.如何阅读医学论文 把握你的方向——判断论文的实质[J].英国医学杂志中文版,1999,2(1):44-48. 被引量:4
  • 10张克坚,杨振华.应用ROC曲线图评价检验项目的临床准确性[J].江西医学检验,1999,17(2):66-68. 被引量:44

共引文献235

同被引文献78

引证文献5

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部