期刊文献+

尼泊尔人尼泊尔语、英语和汉语三语阅读的fMRI定位 被引量:1

Functional magnetic resonance image study on the brain areas involved in reading Chinese,English, and Nepali in Nepalese
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:利用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)探讨以尼泊尔语为母语,以英语和汉语为第二语言的尼泊尔人,进行三语阅读联想时,大脑激活区域的差异。方法:采用血氧水平依赖法(BOLD)组块设计,检测6名健康三语尼泊尔人,接受汉语单词、英语单词和尼泊尔语单词任务视觉刺激时,相关脑区激活特点,并分析其差异。结果:除负责视觉活动的枕叶为双侧激活,汉语任务主要激活了双侧额上回、额中回、中央前回、顶上小叶、颞上回及颞中回;英语任务主要激活了左侧额上回、中央前回、顶上小叶、颞上回、颞下回及小脑;尼泊尔语任务主要激活了左侧中央前回、额上回及颞上回。汉语任务主要是大脑半球双侧激活,英语任务及尼泊尔语任务大多为左侧大脑半球激活。结论:三种语言任务大脑激活区域及范围随语言的熟悉程度增加而递减。颞上回可能参与词汇的联想过程。 Objective To explore the different brain areas activated by Chinese, English, and Nepali word tasks in Nepalese by using the functional magnetic resonance image (fMRI). Methods To determine the neuroanatomic functional brain areas responsible for Chinese, English and Nepali reading as well as sentence-formation, blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) block design by fMRI was performed in 6 healthy Nepalese volunteers. Results During Chinese reading, the activated areas included bilateral motor area, subfrontal gyri, superior temporal gyri, and superior parietal lobule; during English reading, the activated areas were left motor area, left subfrontal gyrus, left supra temporal gyrus, left insula and bilateral cerebellum; and the Nepali task demonstrated the activation of left anterior central gyrus, superior frontal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus. Aside from the bilateral occipital lobes, both English and Nepali activated areas were the left cerebral hemisphere dominant. Conclusion The more familiar with the language, the fewer areas are activated. Superior temporal gyrus might be involved in sentence-formation.
出处 《中南大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第5期759-762,共4页 Journal of Central South University :Medical Science
关键词 功能磁共振 汉语 英语 尼泊尔语 大脑功能 fMRI Chinese English Nepalese brain function
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1刘丽虹,张积家,谭力海.双语脑的研究:不同的语言是否有不同的皮层机制?[J].心理科学,2004,27(3):759-762. 被引量:15
  • 2Ding G,Perry C,Peng D,et al.Neural mechanisms underlying semantic and orthographicprocessing in Chinese-English bilinguals[J].Neuroreport,2003,14(12):1557-1562.
  • 3Chee M W,Weekes B,Lee K M,et al.Overlap and dissociation of semantic processing ofChinese characters,English words,and pictures:evidence fromFmri[J].Neuroimage,2000,12(4):392-403.
  • 4Frenck-Mestre C,Anton J L,Roth M,et al.Articulation in early and late bilinguals' twolanguages:evidence from functional magnetic resonanceimaging[J].Neuroreport,2005,16(7):761-765.
  • 5Whitehouse P,User T,Ruhlen M,et al.Kusunda:an Indo-Pacific language in Nepal[J].ProcNatl Acad Sci USA,2004,101(15):5692-5695.
  • 6Chee,M W L,Caplan D.Mandarian and English single processing of visional presentedsentences in Mandarin and English studies with Fmri[J].Neuron,1999,5 (23):127-137.idencefrom functional magnetic resonance imaging[J].Neuroreport,2005,16(7):761-765.
  • 7Perani D,Paulesu E,Galles N S,et al.The bilingual brain.Proficiency and age ofacquisition of the second language[J].Brain,1998,121 (PT 10):1841-1852.

二级参考文献22

  • 1Perani, D , Paulesu, E , Galles, N S , Dupoux, E , Dehaene,S , Bettinardi, V , Cappa, S F , Fazio, F , and Mehler, J ,The bilingual brain. Proficiency and age of acquisition of the second language. Brain, 1998,121(10): 1841-52.
  • 2Perani, D , Dehaene, S , Grassi, F , Cohen, L , Cappa, S F ,Dupoux, E , Fazio, F , & Mehler, J. Brain processing of nativeand foreign languages. Neuro Report, 1998,7: 2439-2444.
  • 3Dehaene, S , Dupoux, E , Mehler, F , Cohen, L , Paulesu, E ,Peraite, D et al. Anatomical variability in the cortical representation of first and second language. Neuro Report, 1997,8:3809-3815.
  • 4Posner MI and Dehaene S. Trends Neurosci, 1994,17 : 75 - 79.
  • 5Vargha - Khadem F, Carr L, Isaac.s E, Brett E, Adams C, Mishkin M . Onset of speech arter left hemispherectomy in a nine - year- old boy. Brain,1997,120: 159-182.
  • 6Pallier C et al. Brain imaging of language plasticity in adopted adults: Can a second language replace the first? Cerebral Cortex,2003, 13(2) :155 - 161.
  • 7Wet-ker JF, Tees RC. Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am, 1984, 75: 1866- 78.
  • 8Kuhl PK, Williams KA, Lacerda F, Stevens KN, Lindblom B.Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age^[See comments]. Science, 1992; 255: 606 - 608.Comment in: Science, 1992:255 - 535.
  • 9Weber- Fox CM, Neville HJ. Maturational constraints on functional specializations for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in biingual speakers. J Cogn Neurosce, 1996, 8: 231- 256.
  • 10Pallier C, Bosch L, Sebastian N. A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition, 1997, 64: B9-B17.

共引文献14

同被引文献10

  • 1皮昕.口腔解剖生理学[M].6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:35.
  • 2Laxman Rao P,Mahesh Verma,Hari Parkas.A Clinical Study To Evaluate Tooth Contact Patterns And Correlation With Masticatory Efficiency In Dentulous Subjects[J].Annals and Essences of Dentistry,2010,Ⅱ(3):4-10.
  • 3Takahiro Ogawa DDS,PhDaa,Tatsuo Ogimoto DDSba,et al.Pattern of occlusal contacts in lateral positions:Canine protection and group function validity in classifying guidance[J].The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,1998,80(1):67-74.
  • 4Sandra Morton,Hans Pancherz.Changes in functional occlusion during the postorthodontic retention period:A prospective longitudinal clinical study[J].American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics,2009,135 (3):310-315.
  • 5Torsten Jemt DDSa,Sture Lundquist DDSa,Bjorn Hedegard DDS DrOdont.Group function or canine protection[J].The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,2004,91 (5):403-408.
  • 6Jordi Martinez-Gomis,Mar Lujan-Climenta,Sara Palaua,et al.Relationship between chewing side preference and handedness and lateral asymmetry of peripheral factors[J].Archives of Oral Biology,2009,54(2):101-107.
  • 7J P Hatch,R S A Shinkaia,S Sakaia,et al.Determinants of masticatory performance in dentate adults[J].Archives of Oral Biology,2001,46(7):641-648.
  • 8侯潇,汲平,马慧芬,解建立,杜珍,林雪芬.利用咬合力计指导调治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2008,9(1):54-57. 被引量:11
  • 9肖严.吸光度法对30例全口义齿咀嚼效能的比较研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2009,25(11):687-688. 被引量:8
  • 10林云红,汪厚希,李本光.烤瓷修复体修复重度咬合磨耗后的咀嚼效能[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2004,5(2):101-102. 被引量:16

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部