摘要
金融服务贸易目标与金融监管目标的冲突主要表现在:金融服务贸易最严重的壁垒就是不断变化的、重叠的审慎性或保护性管制;各国金融监管法律制度的不同本身就是金融服务贸易的潜在壁垒;金融服务贸易自由化可能导致管制竞争和"管制融化"的风险。自由贸易体制下审慎监管措施的合法性与独立性、金融服务贸易自由化对金融监管的双重要求,是金融服务贸易目标与监管目标产生冲突的主要原因。贸易目标与管制目标的固有冲突在 WTO 体制下更为突出。但在协调两者的冲突方面,WTO 的现有规则只能起到一些有限的作用。作者认为,最低限度的协成员国的监管规则是目前解决贸易目标与监管目标冲突的有效方法。
The conflict between the aim of trade in financial services and the aim of financial supervision is showed in the following aspects: first, prudential, or protective rules and regulations, always changeable and overlapping, is the most severe barrier against the trade in financial services; second, different financial supervisory systems in different countries constitute underlying barrier; third, liberalization of trade in financial services may cause the risk of regulation competition and regulation melt. The legality and independence background of free-trade system, and the double demands of liberalization of of prudential regulatory measures under the trade in financial services on financial supervision are main causes resulting in the conflict. Unfortunately, present rules under WTO system can only exert some limited effects, so the inherent conflict shows more sharply between the aim of trade in financial services and the one of financial supervision. The author holds that to harmonize minimally regulatory rules and regulations in the WTO members is an efficient way to settle the conflict.
出处
《法学家》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第5期154-160,共7页
The Jurist
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2005年度重大研究项目"二十一世纪国际金融法律制度创新与发展研究"(项目批准号05JJD820005)的研究成果
关键词
WTO
金融服务贸易目标
金融监管目标
协调
WTO
the aim of trade in financial services
the aim of financial supervision
harmonization