期刊文献+

国家卫生系统绩效测量与统计指标的概念框架 被引量:18

A Conceptual Framework of Performance Measurement and Statistical Indicators for National Health System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 卫生系统绩效评价是2000年世界卫生组织提出的先进的卫生系统绩效评价方法,建立绩效测量与统计指标的概念框架是完善国家卫生服务系统功能的基础。定义衡量目标实现进度的关键绩效指标(KPI),并建立KPI测量标准和标尺是得出绩效评分和位次的主要步骤。本研究根据国家卫生信息标准基础框架———国家卫生信息数据模型,对模型中的超级实体“卫生业务”中的“绩效目标”子实体做了扩展,兼顾国际可比性和我国的实用性,提出了由8个KPI组成的国家卫生系统绩效测量指标集,并阐述了指标的内容、测量标准及其意义,同时还简要讨论了数据元的标准化、指标标尺的制定等有关问题。 Performance evaluation of healthcare systems is a new idea provided by WHO in 2000. The conceptual framework of performance t and statistical indicators involved is the foundations of improving the performance of a health system. The main approach of getting the results of evaluation is defining the Key Performance Indicators (KPI) and their benchmarks and criterions. This paper extended the sub - entity of performance goal, whose super - entity is the health business in National Conceptual Health Data Model. The authors provided an indicator set for measuring national healthcare system achievement, which is composed of 8 KPIs and with each of the indicator defined and expounded. Further more, the issues of metadata standards and establishing reasonable benchmarks were also discussed.
出处 《中国卫生统计》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第5期386-389,392,共5页 Chinese Journal of Health Statistics
关键词 卫生服务 绩效 数据模型 Delivery of health care, Performance, Data model
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1胡善联.评价卫生系统绩效的新框架——介绍2000年世界卫生报告[J].卫生经济研究,2000,17(7):5-7. 被引量:31
  • 2钱军程,饶克勤,陈育德.世界健康调查基本思想、方法和内容概述与探讨[J].中华预防医学杂志,2004,38(1):62-64. 被引量:9
  • 3WHO.World Health Report2005:Make Every Motherand Child Count.http://www.who.int/entity/whr/2005/media _ centre/en/
  • 4WHO.2000年世界卫生报告/卫生系统:发展进程.人民卫生出版社,2000,152-155.
  • 5蒋泽先.中国农民生死报告.江西人民出版社,2005,5.
  • 6刘丹红 徐勇勇 王瑞.势在必行的基础框架[J].计算机世界,2006,(23):12-12.
  • 7徐勇勇 刘丹红 潘峰.基础框架的体系结构与内容[J].计算机世界,2006,(23):14-14.
  • 8WHO.The World Health Report 2000--Health Systems:Improving Performance.http://www.who.int/entity/whr/2005/media-centre/en/
  • 9Six Sigma Tutorials.Six Sigma Definition.http://sixsigmatutorial.com/Six-Sigma/Six-Sigma-Tutorial.aspx? ref= aw.

二级参考文献9

  • 1KishL.SurveySampling[]..1965
  • 2Wold Health Organization.World Health Survey Brocher[].Geneva:WHO.2001
  • 3Wold Health Organization.World Health Report 2000: health systems: improving performance[].Geneva.2000
  • 4Smith W,Mitchell P,Attebo K,et al.Selection bias from sampling frames: telephone directory and electoral roll compared with door-to-door population census: results from the Blue Mountains Eye Study[].Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health.1997
  • 5Brambilla DJ,McKinlay SM.A comparison of responses to mailed questionnaires and telephone interviews in a mixed mode health survey[].American Journal of Epidemiology.1987
  • 6Smith W,Chey T,Jalaludin B,et al.Increasing response rates in telephone surveys: a randomized trial[].Journal of Public Health.1995
  • 7Robert WO,George FB,Susan BS,et al.A comparison of the Kish and last birthday methods of respondent selection in telephone surveys[].Journal of Official Statistics.1998
  • 8Diane B,Jesse AC,Joseph AC.Random selection in a national telephone survey: a comparison of the Kish, next-birthday, and last-birthday methods[].Journal of Official Statistics.2000
  • 9Kish L.A procedure for objective respondent selection within the household[].Journal of the American Statistical Association.1949

共引文献38

同被引文献149

引证文献18

二级引证文献269

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部