期刊文献+

模拟验证等效性检验中β的单、双侧取值 被引量:3

The Determination of β in Bioequivalence Test by Monte Carlo Simulation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究临床试验中等效性检验的样本量的计算问题。方法在概括总结影响等效性检验的样本量与检验效能的几个主要因素(α、β、θ、Δ、σ)的基础上,重点介绍了等效性检验中α与β的确定与含义,并指出了文献中所存在的分歧;然后利用计算机抽样模拟的方法,依据不同设计类型、不同参数取值下计算的样本量,模拟估算所对应的检验效能。结果模拟验证了β应该取单侧还是双侧并给出了较为合理的解释。结论在等效性检验的样本量估算中,当θ为0时,β取双侧;当θ不等于0时,β取单侧。 Objective To study the sample size calculation of bioequivalence test in clinical trial. Methods Summarized the factors which affected power and sample size in traditional and equivalence test such as α、β、θ ,△and δ, and introduced the meaning of α and βin detail, what' s more, we pointed out the divergence in literatures about this topic. Then the Monte Carlo simulations were used to estimate power in a given sample size calculated by traditional formulation with different designs, different θ and CV. Results we confirmed whether β should be one - sided or two - sided in equivalence test and gave the rational explanation. Conclusion β should be two - sided when θ is zero in calculation of sample size of bioequivahnee test, otherwise, β is one - sided.
出处 《中国卫生统计》 CSCD 北大核心 2006年第5期407-409,412,共4页 Chinese Journal of Health Statistics
关键词 等效性检验 样本量 检验效能 Equivalence test, Sample size, Power of test
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Chow SC,Liu JP.Design and Analysis of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies Second Edition,Revised and Expanded,Maecel Dekker,INC:125-132.
  • 2刘玉秀,姚晨,陈峰,陈启光,苏炳华,孙瑞元.非劣效性/等效性试验中的统计学分析[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2000,16(6):448-452. 被引量:32
  • 3Hwang IK.Superiority,Noninferiority and Equivalencetrials.北京:新药临床研究生物统计学国际学术研讨会,2003:01.
  • 4Chow SC,Liu JP.Design and Analysis of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies Second Edition,Revised and Expanded,Maecel Dekker,INC:155-160.

二级参考文献2

共引文献31

同被引文献25

  • 1于莉莉,夏结来,蒋红卫.三种不同方法估算等效性检验的样本量与检验效能[J].中国卫生统计,2006,23(4):336-338. 被引量:2
  • 2黄钦,赵明.对临床试验统计学假设检验中非劣效、等效和优效性设计的认识[J].中国临床药理学杂志,2007,23(1):63-67. 被引量:25
  • 3Bland JM. Sample size for a study of agreement between two meth-ods of measurement, http://www, users, york. ac. uk/ mb55/ meas/sizemeth, html.
  • 4Bland JM, Altman DG. Agreed statistics:measurement method com- parison. Anesthesiology,2012,116 : 182 -185.
  • 5Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1986: 307- 310.
  • 6Chow SC, Shao J, Wang H. Sample Size Calculation in Clinical Re- search. 2nd edition. Chapman & Hall/CRC. 2008:57-61.
  • 7Hwang IK, Morikawa T. Design issues in non-inferior- ity/equivalence trials [ J ]. Drug Inf J, 1999,33 : 1205- 1218.
  • 8Redmond CK, Colton T. Biostatistics in Clinical Trials [ M]. Chichester:John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2001 : 179- 183, 403-405.
  • 9Chow SC, Shao J, Wang H. Sample Size Calculation in Clinical Research [ M ]. 2nd edition. New York: CRC Press, 2008:57-61.
  • 10刘玉秀.临床试验设计与分析[M]//刘桂芬,主编.医学统计学.2版.北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2007:180-202.

引证文献3

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部