期刊文献+

Flux enhancement during ultrafiltration of produced water using turbulence promoter 被引量:7

Flux enhancement during ultrafiltration of produced water using turbulence promoter
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Concentration polarization and membrane fouling remain one of the major hurdles for the implementation of ultrafiltration of produced water. Although many applications for ultrafiltration were already suggested, only few were implemented on an industrial scale. Among those techniques, turbulence promoter can be more simple and effective in overcoming membrane fouling and enhancing membrane flux. As for the result that turbulence promoter increase fluid velocity, wall shear rates and produce secondary flows or instabilities, the influence of turbulence promoter was investigated on permeate flux during produced water ultrafiltration and the potential application of this arrangement for an industrial development. Experimental investigations were performed on 100 KDa molecular weight cut-off PVDF single-channel tubular membrane module using four kinds of turbulence promoters. It is observed that the significant flux enhancement in the range of 83%--164% was achieved while the hydraulic dissipated power per unit volume of permeate decreased from 31%--42%, which indicated that the using of turbulence promoter is more efficient than operation without the turbulence promoter. The effects of transmembrane pressure and cross-flow velocity with and without turbulence promoter were studied as well. Among the four kinds of turbulence promoters, winding inserts with 20.0 mm pitch and 1.0 mm wire diameter showed better performances than the others did. Concentration polarization and membrane fouling remain one of the major hurdles for the implementation of ultrafiltration of produced water. Although many applications for ultrafiltration were already suggested, only few were implemented on an industrial scale. Among those techniques, turbulence promoter can be more simple and effective in overcoming membrane fouling and enhancing membrane flux. As for the result that turbulence promoter increase fluid velocity, wall shear rates and produce secondary flows or instabilities, the influence of turbulence promoter was investigated on permeate flux during produced water ultrafiltration and the potential application of this arrangement for an industrial development. Experimental investigations were performed on 100 KDa molecular weight cut-off PVDF single-channel tubular membrane module using four kinds of turbulence promoters. It is observed that the significant flux enhancement in the range of 83%--164% was achieved while the hydraulic dissipated power per unit volume of permeate decreased from 31%--42%, which indicated that the using of turbulence promoter is more efficient than operation without the turbulence promoter. The effects of transmembrane pressure and cross-flow velocity with and without turbulence promoter were studied as well. Among the four kinds of turbulence promoters, winding inserts with 20.0 mm pitch and 1.0 mm wire diameter showed better performances than the others did.
出处 《Journal of Environmental Sciences》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2006年第6期1077-1081,共5页 环境科学学报(英文版)
基金 The National Basic Research Program (973) of China (No. 2004CB418505)
关键词 hydraulic dissipated power flux enhancement turbulence promoter produced water ULTRAFILTRATION hydraulic dissipated power flux enhancement turbulence promoter produced water ultrafiltration
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Cui Z F,Wright K I T,1994.Gas-liquid two-phase cross-flow ultrafiltration of BSA and dextran solutions[J].J Membr Sci,90:183-189.
  • 2Gan Q,Allen S J,1999.Crossflow microfiltration of a primary sewage effluent-solids retentation efficiency and flux enhancement[J].J Chem Technol Biotechnol,74:693-699.
  • 3Gupta B B,Howell J A,Wu D et al.,1995.A helical baffle for cross-flow microfiltration[J].J Membr Sci,99:31-42.
  • 4Huotari M H,Huisman I H,1999.Electrically enhanced crossflow membrane filtration of oily waste water using the membrane as a cathode[J].J Membr Sci,156:49-60.
  • 5Kobayashi T,Chai X,Fujii N,1999.Ultrasound enhanced cross-flow membrane filtration[J].Sep PurifTechnol,17:31-40.
  • 6Krsti D M,Teki M N,Cari M D et al.,2003.Kenics static mixer as turbulence promoter in cross-flow microfiltration of skim milk[J].Sep PurifTechnol,38:1549-1560.
  • 7Ma H M,Hakim L F,Bowman C N et al.,2001.Factors affecting membrane fouling reduction by surface modification and backpulsing[J].J Membr Sci,189:255-270.
  • 8Mietton M,Aim R B,1992.Improvement of crossflow microfiltration performance with flocculation[J].J Membr Sci,68:241-248.
  • 9Nabe A,Staude E,Belfort G,1997.Surface modification of polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes and fouling by BSA solutions[J].J Membr Sci,133:57-72.
  • 10Pharoah J G,Djilali N,Vickers G W,2000.Fluid mechanics and mass transport in centrifugal membrane separation[J].J Membr Sci,176:277-289.

同被引文献78

引证文献7

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部