试论口供证据价值功能的五大原则

Five Principles of Oral Statement Evidence Value in Criminal Proceedings

要想突破口供是证据之王的传统法律思维,在我国建立起审查口供的原则势在必行。该文立足于本国的实际,合理借鉴国外的证据制度的经验,大胆地构建了在刑事诉讼中审查判断证据是否具有证据价值功能的五大原则,即相关性原则、法律真实性原则、程序合法性原则、人权性原则、补强性原则。

It is essential to set up the principles that judge oral statement by defendant whether has evidence value or not in the criminal proceedings in our country if we want to break the traditional thought that oral statement by defendant is＂the king of evidence＂. This paper, based on the actual situation of our country, borrowing experience of evidence from foreign countries, construts five principles which judge oral statement by defendant whether has evidence value or not in criminal proceedings, namely： relevance principle, legal truth principle, procedure legitimacy principle, human rights principle, adminicular evidence principle.