摘要
陆机为太康之英的评价本出自钟嵘的《诗品.总论》,但是后来有不少的论者不同意此说,或认为潘岳胜于陆机,或认为左思胜于陆机,总之,太康之英的桂冠不该属于陆机。笔者认为,不管是从人格魅力、文学创作、文学理论还是对后世文学的影响来看,太康之英的桂冠非陆机莫属,钟嵘对陆机的评价实为千古定评。
Comment on Lu Ji as the Poet Laureate comes from ＂Poem Appreciation＂ by Zhong Rong.But many critics disagree with the appraisal. Some think Pan Yue surpasses Lu Ji, others consider Zuo Si overtakes him. In a final analysis, Poet Laureate should get away from Lu Ji. The author holds the reputation belongs to no other person than Lu Ji whether from Lu Ji＇s personal charm,Literature writing, literary theory or the influence to the literature of the later generation.Zhong Rong＇s comment stands forever in the coming future.
出处
《石河子大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
2006年第5期63-66,共4页
Journal of Shihezi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
陆机
太康之英
钟嵘
诗品
Lu Ji
the Poet Laureate
Zhong Rong
poem appreciation
