期刊文献+

全胸段食管切除对胸下段食管癌患者术后生存率影响的临床研究 被引量:3

Clinic study of total esophagectomy postoperatively on survival rate of esophageal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨全胸段食管切除与胸中下段食管切除对食管癌患者术后生存率的影响,确定食管癌根治术的最佳手术入路,提高患者手术后长期生存率。方法:我院胸外科1999年1月~2001年12月对193例胸下段食管癌患者,行左胸后外侧切口(Ⅰ组)67例,行左胸后外侧切口+左颈切口(Ⅱ组)65例,行三切口(Ⅲ组)155例,完成食管癌食管切除术、经食管床食管重建术。结果:Ⅰ组患者术后1、3和5年生存率分别为77.14%、78.43%和82.54%,Ⅱ组分别为62.62%、58.36%和61.09%,Ⅲ组分别为38.12%、39.32%和42.07%。三组患者术后1、3年生存率差异无统计学意义,P〉0.05。Ⅰ、Ⅲ组间5年生存率差异有统计学意义,P〈0.05。Ⅰ、Ⅱ组间及Ⅱ、Ⅲ间5年生存率差异无统计学意义,P〉0.05。结论:胸下段食管癌病例采取三切口的手术入路,5年生存率高于左胸后外侧切口组,且与左胸+左颈二切口相比,长期生存率显示增高的趋势。对于胸下段食管癌病例,应选择三切口手术入路。 OBJECTIVE: To discuss the efficiency of the tatol esophagectomy on the long-survival rate of esophageal cancer, determine the best approach for lower segment of thoracic esophageal cancer and increase the postoperative survival rate of esophagectomy. METHIDS: From Jan 1999 to Dec 2001, We adopted different surgical approaches of esophagectomy in 193 cases with esophageal cancer, such as left posterior thoracotomy (group Ⅰ) in 67 cases, left posterior thoracotomy plus cervical incision (group Ⅱ) in 65 cases, right anterior thoracotomy (group Ⅲ) in 61 cases. 1,3,5-years postoperative survival rate were compared between the three groups. RESULTS: 1,3,5-years postoperative survival rate were 77.14%, 78.43%, 82.54%, 62.62%, 58.36%, 61.09% and 38.12%, 39.32%, 42.07% in group Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ respectively; The 1,3-years survival rate was found no statistic difference between three groups, P〉0.05. The 5-year survival rate was statistically different between group Ⅰ and group Ⅲ, P〈0.05; there were no statistic difference between group Ⅰ and Ⅱ (P〉0.05); no statistic difference were found between group Ⅱ and group Ⅲ, P〉0.05; but the trend of postoperative survival rate in group Ⅲ was seemly longer than that of group Ⅰ and Ⅱ. CONCLUSIONS: Right anterior thoracotomy was a better approach in totally thoracic esophagectomy of esophageal carcinoma. Compared with left posterior thoracotomy (group Ⅰ) and left posterior thoracotomy with cervical incision (group Ⅱ), right anterior thoracotomy might prolong postoperative survival rate in the patient with esophageal cancer.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 2006年第18期1418-1420,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 食管肿瘤 食管切除术 生存率 esophageal cancer esophagectomy postoperative survival rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1张合林,平育敏,杜喜群,白世祥,何清波.应用Cox模型分析影响食管癌切除术后的预后因素[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1999,21(1):32-34. 被引量:39
  • 2Ando N, Ozawa S, Kitagawa Y, et al. Improvement in the results of surgical treatment of advanced squamous esophageal carcinoma during 15 consecutive years [J]. Ann Surg, 2000,232(2) :225-232.
  • 3邵令方,高宗人,卫功铨,许金良,陈明耀,程金华.食管癌和贲门癌的外科治疗[J].中华外科杂志,2001,39(1):44-46. 被引量:256
  • 4Torres A J, Sanche-Pernaute A, Hernado F, et al. Two field radical lymohadenectomy in the treatment of esophageal carcinoma[J]. Dis Esophagus, 1999,12(2) : 137-143.
  • 5Kato H. Lymph node dissection for thorac esophageal carcinoma: Two and three-field lymph node dissection [J]. Ann Chir Cynaecol, 1995,84 (2) : 193- 199.
  • 6Nishihira T, H irayma K, Mori S. A preoperative randomized trial of extended cervical and superior lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the thorac esophagus[J]. Am J Surg,1998, 175(1) : 47-51.
  • 7Siewert J R, Stein H J. Lymph-node dissection in squamous cell esophageal cancer-who benefits [J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg,1999, 384(2):141-148.
  • 8许运龙,郭昭扬.胸部食管癌转移淋巴结数与预后的临床研究[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2000,22(3):244-246. 被引量:43

二级参考文献14

  • 1邵令方,李章才.204例早期食管癌和贲门癌切除治疗的远期结果[J].中华外科杂志,1993,31(3):131-133. 被引量:102
  • 2邵令方,高宗人,卫功铨,许金良,陈明耀,王文光.食管癌和贲门癌外科治疗进展──9107例资料分析[J].中华胸心血管外科杂志,1994,10(1):41-43. 被引量:185
  • 3杨乃普.食管癌和贲门癌切除术后切缘有癌残留的94例分析[J].中国肿瘤临床,1986,13(1):8-8.
  • 4金丕焕,医用统计方法(第2版),1993年,387页
  • 5黄国俊,食管癌和贲门癌,1990年,138页
  • 6全国肿瘤防治办公室,中国常见恶性肿瘤诊治规范.1,1990年,6页
  • 7全国肿瘤防治办公室,中国常见恶性肿瘤诊治规范.9,1990年,16页
  • 8邵令方,食管外科学,1987年,452页
  • 9曹子昂(译),国际癌分期标准,1994年,61页
  • 10邵令方,中华胸心血管外科杂志,1994年,10卷,41页

共引文献329

同被引文献35

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部