期刊文献+

表征影响三门问题解决的实验研究 被引量:7

An Experimental Study on the Influence of Representation on the Resolving of Three Doors Problem
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本实验选取120名大一学生,设计了四种不同的处理,研究表征对解决三门问题及其迁移问题的影响,结果表明:(1)三门问题困难原因有害怕后悔、控制错觉和错误表征问题空间等,其中错误表征问题空间是主要原因。(2)清晰表征选手行为和主持人行为的逻辑关系显著地促进了三门问题的解决,而只有在逻辑关系基础上的频率表征才能够更进一步地促进三门问题的解决,在此基础上概率形式的信息表征没有更显著的促进作用。(3)在逻辑关系分解基础上的频率表征无论对结构相似还是内容相似的迁移问题的解决都有最好的正迁移效果。 By designing four treatments, the experiment studied the influence of representation on the resolving of the three doors problem and its transfer. The results indicated that : ( 1 ) there are several reasons that make the three doors problem hard such as regret, the illusion of control, the misrepresentation of the problem space, etc., but the misrepresentation is the most important reason; (2) clear representation of the logical relation between the contestant and the host is the key of resolving three doors problems. The frequent form representation based on logical logic relation representation enhances the resolution of three doors problems ; (3) the participants who acquire the correct experience from frequent form representation can resolve the transfer whether it is similar in content or in structure.
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第4期29-34,共6页 Psychological Development and Education
基金 国家重点学科西南大学基础心理学项目资助
关键词 三门问题 表征 迁移 问题解决 实验研究 大一学生 逻辑关系 the three doors problem representation, transfer.
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Tuban E,Alonson D.Overcoming illusory inferences in a probabilistic counterintuitive problem:the role of explicit representations.Memory &Cognition 2003,31(4):596-607.
  • 2Granberg D.Cross-cultural comparison of responses to the Monty Hall dilemma.Social Behavior and Personality,1999,27(4):431-438.
  • 3Franco-Watkins A M,Derks P L,Dougherty,M R P.Reasoning in the Monty Hall problem:Examining choice behaviour and probability judgments.Thinking and Reasoning,2003,9(1):67-90.
  • 4Fox C R,Levan J.Partition-Edit-Count:Extensional Reasoning in Judgment of conditional Probability.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,2004,133(4):626-642.
  • 5Burns B D,Wieth M.The collider principle in causal reasoning:why the Monty Hall dilemma is so hard.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,2004,133(3):434-449.
  • 6Krauss S,Wang X T.The psychology of the Monty Hall problem:Discovering psychological mechanisms for solving a tenacious brain teaser.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,2003,132(1):3-22.
  • 7Gigerenzer G,Hoffrage U.How to improve beyesian reasoning without instruction:frequency formats.Psychological Review.1995,102 (4):684-704.
  • 8傅小兰,赵晓东.信息表征形式对解决贝叶斯推理问题的影响[J].心理与行为研究,2005,3(2):109-115. 被引量:13
  • 9Evans J St B T,Handley S J,Perham N,Over,etal.Frequency versus probability formats in statistical word problems.Cognition,2000,77;197-213.
  • 10Girotto V,Gonzales G.Solving probabilistic and statistical problems:a matter of information structure and question form.Cognition,2001,78; 247-276.

二级参考文献15

  • 1GerdGigerenzer,包燕.生态学智力:人类的推理算法对频率的适应[J].心理学动态,2001,9(4):325-329. 被引量:4
  • 2赵晓东,傅小兰.贝叶斯推理的改进方法——以频率格式代替概率格式进行信息表征[J].心理科学,2002,25(1):96-97. 被引量:10
  • 3[1]Cosmides L,Tooby J.Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty.Cognition,1996,58:1~73
  • 4[2]Eddy D M.Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine in judgment under uncertainty:Heuristics and biases.In:D Kahneman,P Slovic,A Tversky,ed.Judgment under Uncertainty:Heuristics and Biases,Cambridge,England:Cambridge University Press,1982.249~268
  • 5[3]Gigerenzer G,Hoffrage U.How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction:Frequency formats.Psychological Review,1995,102:684~704
  • 6[4]Hammerton M.A case of radical probability estimation.Journal of Experimental Psychology,1973,101:252~254
  • 7[5]Schwartz W B,Gorry G A,Kassirer J P,et al.Decision analysis and clinical judgement.American Journal of Medicine,1973,55:459~472
  • 8[6]Kahneman D,Tversky A.Subjective probability:A judgment of representativeness.Cognitive Psychology,1972,3:430~454
  • 9[7]Kahneman D,Slovic P,Tversky A.Judgment under Uncertainty:Heuristics and Biases.Cambridge,England:Cambridge University Press,1982
  • 10[8]Koehler J J.The base rate fallacy reconsidered:Descriptive,normative,and methodological challenges.Behavioral and Brain Sciences,1996,19:1~53

共引文献15

同被引文献110

引证文献7

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部