摘要
目的:探讨甲型副伤寒的临床特征和药物敏感特点。方法:回顾性分析21例甲型副伤寒患者(副伤寒组)的临床特征和药敏特点,与在中国学术期刊(光盘版)随机查找1994~1996年度的伤寒文献级(伤寒组)相比较。结栗:伤寒组和副伤寒组有伤寒及副伤寒中典型特征者、明显全身中毒症状者、相对缓脉、表情淡漠及脾肿大的发生率分别为86.1%、62.5%、36.4%、51%、12.6%和4.8%、38.1%、9.5%、52.9%,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05~P〈0.01);发热、玫瑰疹及肝肿大的发生率分别为99.I%、14.1%、19.1%和100.0%、9.5%、29.4%,差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。副伤寒组喹诺酮类药物敏感率100.0%,三代头孢敏感率90%以上。结论:甲型副伤寒临床症状不典型,中毒症状轻,脾肿大、相对缓脉和表情淡漠较多见。治疗首选喹诺酮类药物,次选第三代头孢菌素、氯霉素。
Objective: To analyze the clinical features and drug sensitivity of paratyphoid A. Methods: Twenty-one cases of paratyphoid A were analyzed retrospectively. The clinical features and drug sensitivity were compared with the cases selected randomly in Chinese Academic Journal(CD) from 1994 - 1996. Results: The presentation of typical characteristics of typhoid and paratyphoid was 86.1% and 4.8% in the typhoid group and paratyphoid A group respectively;obvious toxic symptoms were observed in 62.5% of the patients in the typhoid group and 38.1% in the paratyphoid A group;The incidence of relative infrequent pulse was 36.4% and 9.5% in the typhoid group and paratyphoid A group respectively; The apathia rate was 51% in the typhoid group and 9.5% in the paratyphoid A group;The incidence rate of enlarged spleen was 12.6% and 52.9% in the typhoid group and paratyphoid A group respectively ( P 〈 0.05 - P 〈 0.01 ). The difference was significant. The incidence of fever, rose rash and hepatauxe was 99.1%, 14.1% and 19.1% in the typhoid group and 100% ,9.5% and 29.4% in the paratyphoid A group, respectively; the difference was not significant (P 〉0.05). The sensitiveness rate of quinolones was 100% and the sensitiveness rate of the third generation ephamycins was above 90%. Conclusions: Clinical symptoms of paratyphoid A are not typical. Quinolones is the first medicine for treatment of paratyphoid A, and the third generation ephamycins and chlormycetin are the second choice.
出处
《蚌埠医学院学报》
CAS
2006年第6期614-616,共3页
Journal of Bengbu Medical College