期刊文献+

提高英语专业八级口译成绩的若干教学策略

Several Teaching Strategies for the Improvement of Students' Oral Translation Performances at TEM
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在克拉申的语言学习监测模式的基础上,比亚利斯托克提出了策略模式将学习者的语言学习过程定位于四个基本的、带有通用意味的培养阶段。经过我们的仔细研究,发现该模式完全可以胜任针对口译教学的策略性指导工作。接着,我们从这个宏观模式出发进一步探讨了在语言输入、知识和语言输出之间如何借助一些具体性的方针策略整合其他相关课程的阶段性成果,以便促使学生周而复始地调动三类知识综合推理最终保证无限接近“信、达、雅”的产出质量。 Based on the Krashen' s Monitor Model for language acquisition, Bialystok, G. put forward the Strategy Model where the subjects' language learning process can he oriented at the four basic training stages that might he universally available. Through our careful survey, the Strategy Model is found diametrically qualifying for the guide work strategically directed at the oral interpretation instruetions.We,then,start from this macrocosmic model to further explore how to integrate among language input, output and knowledge fruits at different stages of other relevant courses by means of several concrete orientations and strategies, as a result of which students are supposed to he induced to repeatedly involve three types of knowledge into comprehensive inference,thus finally guaranteeing that the output quality is most likely to he perfect all around.
作者 温金海 黄能
出处 《黑龙江教育学院学报》 2006年第6期148-149,共2页 Journal of Heilongjiang College of Education
基金 南京财经大学科研项目(GJ0407)
关键词 策略模式 语言输入 知识 语言输出 the Strategy Model language input knowledge language output
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献73

  • 1邹申.试论口语测试的真实性[J].外语界,2001(3):74-78. 被引量:80
  • 2熊敦礼,陈玉红,刘泽华,黄更新.大学英语大规模录音口语测试研究[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(4):283-287. 被引量:54
  • 3Clark, J. L. D. Validation of a tape-mediated ACTFL/ILR scale-based test of Chinese speaking proficiency [J]. Language Testing, 1988(5) :187-198.
  • 4Douglas, D. Quantity and quality in speaking test performance [J]. Language Testing, 1994 (11) :125-144.
  • 5Egbert, M. M. Miscommunication in language proficiency interviews of first-year German students: a comparison with natural conversation[A]. In R. Yong& A. W. He(eds. ). Talking and Testing: Discourse Approaches to the Assessment of Oral Proficiency[C]. (Studies in Bilingualism, Vol. 14), Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1998.
  • 6Egyud, G. & P. Glover. Oral testing in pairs - a secondary perspective[J]. English Language Teaching Journal, 2001 (55) :70-6.
  • 7Elder, C. , N. Iwashita & T. McNamara. 2002. Estimating the difficulty of oral proficiency : What does the test-taker have to offer? [J]. Language Testing, 2001(19) : 347-368.
  • 8Fulcher, G. The Construct Validation of Rating Scales for Oral Tests in English as a Foreign Language[D]. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Lancaster University, Lancaster, 1993.
  • 9Fulcher, G. Testing tasks.. Issues in task design and the group oral[J]. Language Testing, 1996a (13): 23-51.
  • 10Fulcher, G. Invalidating validity claims for the ACTFL oral rating scale[J]. System, 1996b (24): 163-172.

共引文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部