期刊文献+

污染土壤微生物群落结构多样性及功能多样性测定方法 被引量:57

Methods to measure the microbial community structure and functional diversity in polluted soils
下载PDF
导出
摘要 土壤微生物在促进土壤质量和植物健康方面发挥着重要的作用,土壤微生物群落结构和组成的多样性及其变化在一定程度上反映了土壤质量。为了更好地了解土壤健康状况,非常有必要发展有效的方法来研究污染土壤微生物的多样性、分布以及行为等。回顾了近年来国内外污染土壤微生物群落结构多样性及功能多样性的测定方法,包括生物化学技术和分子生物学技术,现将它们的原理、优缺点、实用性及其发展动态作一阐述,同时指出结合这两种技术可为微生物群落分析提供一个更全面的、精确的方法。 Soil microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi, play important roles in promoting soil quality and improving plant health and nutrition, thus influencing terrestrial ecosystems. Increasing anthropegenic activities, such as sprawling urbanization, agricultural development, pesticides utilization, and pollutions from all sources, can potentially affect soil microbial community composition and diversity, leading to deterioration of soil quality and fertility. However, it is yet to be determined how these changes in microbial diversity can influence surface and ground ecosystems. To that end, there is an acute need for reliable and accurate methods to study the community structure and taxonomy of soil microorganisms. Without the development of effective methods for studying the microbial diversity, distribution, and behavior in polluted soil, a thorough understanding of microbial diversity, as well as its impact on soil health, cannot be achieved. The determination of species diversity depends on several factors including the intensity of each species, the total number of species present, species evenness, and the spatia] distribution of species. Methods to measure microbial community structure and functional diversity in polluted soils can be classified into two groups, i.e., biochemical-based techniques and molecular biological-based techniques. Typically, diversity studies include the relative comparisons of communities across a gradient of stress and disturbance. With current techniques, it is difficult to study true diversity due to lack of knowledge on composition and the techniques to determine the accuracy of the extraction or detection methods. Traditionally, the analysis of soil microbial communities has always depended on culturing techniques using a variety of culture media designed to maximize the recovery of diverse microbial populations. However, only a small fraction ( 〈 1% ) of the soil microbial community has been accessed with this approach. To overcome these problems, other methods such as the community-level physiological profiling and analysis of phospholipid fatty acids have been used in an attempt to measure a greater proportion of the soil microbial community. In recent years, molecular-based approaches for assessing soil microbial community have provided a new understanding of the phylogenetic diversity of microbial communities in polluted soils. Among all the available techniques, the PCR-based methods are most useful including denaturing/temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE/TGGE), amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA), ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (RISA), automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA), etc. The use of these techniques might provide new ways of measuring soil microbial diversity, ultimately leading to a more complete understanding of the potential impacts of pollution on soil microorganisms. Information obtained from such studies will also provide insight on the role of microbial processes in soil health. However, although the PCR-based molecular techniques have been used to overcome the limitations of culture-based methods, they have their own limitations such as the lysis efficiency of cells or fungal structures variation between and within microbial groups. Since each group of methods (biochemical-based versus molecular biological-based) can only provide a partial picture of one aspect of soil microbial diversity, a combined use of techniques from the two groups will certainly help to develop a broader, more complete profile of soil microbial diversity in polluted soils, which will eventually enhance our knowledge on the changes in microbial community function caused by the changes in microbial community structure.
出处 《生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第10期3404-3412,共9页 Acta Ecologica Sinica
基金 国家重点基础研究发展规划"973"资助项目(2002CB410804) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(40201026)~~
关键词 污染土壤 微生物多样性 分子生物学 BIOLOG PLFA PCR DNA polluted soils microbial diversity molecular biology BIOLOG PLFA PCR DNA
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献185

  • 1[1]Elsas J D van,Smalla K. Extraction of microbial community DNA from soils. In: Akkermans A D L, van Elsas J D, de Bruijn F J. eds. Molecular Microbial Ecology Manual. Kluwer Academic Publishers,1995
  • 2[2]Elsas J D van,Duarte G F,Rosado A S,et al. Microbiological and molecular biological methods for monitoring microbial inoculants and their effects in the soil environment. Jour. Microbial. Methods,1998,32:133~154
  • 3[3]Horton T R,Bruns T D.The molecular revolution in ectomycorrhizal ecology: Peeking into the black-box. Molecular Ecology,2001,10:1 855~1 871
  • 4[4]Ogram A. Discussion soil molecular microbial ecology at age 20: Methodological challenges for the future. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2000,32:1 499~1 504
  • 5[5]Bridge Paul,Brian Spooner. Soil fungi: Diversity and detection. Plant and Soil,2001,232:147~154
  • 6[6]Dunbar J,Ticknor L O,Kuske C Rl. Assessment of microbial diversity in four southwestern United States soils by 16S rRNA gene terminal restriction fragment analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbial.,2000,66:2 943~2 950
  • 7[7]Tiedje J M,Asuming-Brempong S,Nüsslein K,et al. Opening the black box of soil microbial diversity. Applied Soil Ecology,1999,13:1 109~1 122
  • 8[8]Ward D M,Weller R,Bateson M M. 16S rRNA sequences reveal numerous unculturated microorganisms in a natural community. Nature,1990,345: 63~65
  • 9[9]Glen M,Tommerup I C,Bougher N L,et al. Specificity,sensitivity and discrimination of primers for PCR-RFLP of larger basidiomycetes and their applicability to identification of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Eucalyptus forests and plantations. Mycol.Res.,2001,105(2): 138~149
  • 10[10]Viaud M,Pasquier A,Brygoo Y. Diversity of soil fungi studied by PCR-RFLP of ITS. Mycol.Res.,2000,104(9): 1 027~1 032

共引文献794

同被引文献1206

引证文献57

二级引证文献550

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部