期刊文献+

我国《信托法》有关“受益人”的规定值得商榷之点

Worthwhile Discussing on Regulation of Concerning Beneficiary in Chinese Trust Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国《信托法》第四章第三节是关于“受益人”的专门规定。该节虽然仅有7个条文,但其中有4个条文存在值得商榷的问题,这就是关于受益人定义和资格的第43条;关于信托受益权开始时间的第44条;关于受益人放弃信托受益权的第46条;关于受益人行使权利与委托人意见不一致处理的第49条。上述问题的存在一定程度上减损了我国《信托法》的立法水平,值得重视。 Section 3 of chapter 4 in trust law is special regulation concerning beneficiary. Although there are only seven articles, four articles in it have some questions which are worthwhile discussing. Those shortcoming - articles include article 43 which is concerning definition and qualification of beneficiary, article 44 which is concerning beginning time of beneficiary - right, article 46 which is concerning reject of beneficiary - right, and article 46 which is concernigu settlement for disaccord between settler and beneficiary when exering own right. In some degree, above questions reduce legislation level of our trust law, we should given enough attention to it.
作者 徐卫
机构地区 厦门大学法学院
出处 《现代财经(天津财经大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第11期72-75,共4页 Modern Finance and Economics:Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics
关键词 信托法 受益人 受益权 缺失 Trust Law Beneficiary Beneficiary - right Shortcoming
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[日]四宫和夫.信托法[M].东京:有斐阁株式会社,1979.
  • 2[法]雅克.盖斯旦等,陈鹏等译.法国民法总[M].北京:法律出版社.2004:232.
  • 3[日]大木雅夫.比较法[M].北京:法律出版社,1999.60-62.
  • 4[德]K·获威格特,H·克茂,潘汉典等译.比较法总论[M].北京:法律出版社.2003:282.
  • 5[美]格伦顿等,米健等译.比较法律传统[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1993:98.
  • 6潘秀菊.信托法之实用权益[M].北京:台湾水然文化出版社.1998:49-50.

共引文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部