长征初期红二、六军团抵制“左”倾军事指挥错误的论争

The Resistance of the Second and Sixth Corps of the Red Army against the “Left” Military Command in the Early Long March

中央红军主力开始长征时,先遣探路的红6军团和红2军团会师后,在两军战略行动方向和统一行动方面,与博古、李德控制的中革军委发生了一场争论。争论焦点在于:两军团是集中行动、统一指挥,还是分开行动、各自直受军委指挥?是集中兵力挺进湘西北开展攻势作战,还是红6军团单独进入湘西建立苏区?这场关系到红军长征成败的重要论争的结果,为红2、6军团的发展壮大,为两军团更好地策应中央红军战略转移,为湘鄂川黔革命根据地创建和发展,为红军三大主力战略格局的形成,为战胜张国焘分裂党和红军的图谋,为红军长征的最后胜利,奠定了坚实的基础。

Soon after the main contingents of the Central Red Army started the Long March, the Sixth Corps and the Second Corps that had been sent to find out the way joined forces and then they had a controversy with the Military Commission of Chinese Revolution controlled by Be Gu and Otto Braun over the direction of strategic movement and unified action. Focuses of the controversy were： Would the two corps act together and be put under unified command or act separately under direct command of the Military Commission？ Would they concentrate their forces and march into Northwest Hunan for offensive operations or would the Sixth Corps alone go to West Hunan and build up a Soviet area there？ The outcome of the controversy that had a direct bearing on the success and failure of the Long March laid an important solid foundation for the expansion of the Second and Sixth Corps, for their better support for the strategic shift of the Central Red Army, for the creation and development of the revolutionary bases in the provinces of Hunan, Hubei, Sichuan and Guizhou, for the formation of the strategic pattern of the three main forces of the Red Army, for the thwarting of Zhang Guotac＇s conspiracy to split the Party and the Red Army and for the final victory of the Long March.