期刊文献+

制衡还是外交摩擦?——法、德、俄等欧洲国家反对美国发动对伊拉克战争:形式及动因浅析 被引量:1

Check and Balance or Diplomatic Friction?—Analysis of Form and Motive of the Opposition of France, Germany, and Russia to the War on Iraqs Led by the U.S.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 法、德、俄等欧洲国家反对美国发动伊拉克战争,此现象引起了国际政治学界和政策界的关注。美国部分学者依据所谓的“软”制衡理论,从反对形式和动因两个方面来阐释、分析这一现象,并得出这种反对具有“制衡”性质的结论。本文针对这一结论,仍从反对形式和动因两个方面来考察欧洲有关国家反对美国发动伊拉克战争这一现象,但得出的结论是,这种反对不是制衡,而是传统的外交摩擦。 The opposition of France, Germony and Russia to the American-led war on Iraq has caused concern among international political scientist and policy analysts. The soft balancing theory proponents in the United States has examined the U.S.-Europe crisis over Iraq in terms of the forms and motives of these European powers' opposition, and has concluded that the opposition is an act of check and balance against the U.S. This article re-examines the opposition still in terms of forms and motives, and concludes that the opposition is traditional diplomatic friction rather than check and balance action aiming at the U.S.
作者 张帆
出处 《国际论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第6期14-19,共6页 International Forum
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979, p. 127.
  • 2Robert A. Pape, "Soft Balancing against the United States", International Security, Vol. 30, No. 1 (Summer, 2005), pp. 7-45,35,34,39-41.
  • 3T.V. Paul, "Soft in the Age of U. S. Primacy", International Security, Vol. 30, No. 1 (Summer, 2005), pp. 46-71.
  • 4Eliot A. Cohen, "The Long-Term Crisis of the Alliance", Foreign Affairs, Vol. 61,No. 2 (Winter 1982/83), pp. 325-343.
  • 5Stephen M. Walt,"The Ties That Fray: Why Europe and America Are Drifting Apart", National Interest, No. 54 (Winter1998-99),pp. 3-11.
  • 6Philip H. Gordon and Jeremy Shapiro, Allies at War: America, Europe, and the Crisis over Iraq, McGraw-Hill, 2004, pp. 161-162.
  • 7Martin Walker, "The Winter of Germany's Discontent",World Policy Journal, Vol.9, No. 4 (Winter 2002/2003),p. 37.
  • 8Philip H. Gordon and Jeremy Shapiro, Allies at War : America, Europe, and the Crisis over Iraq, McGraw-Hill, 2004, p. 103,100,122-123,99,147-154,90.

同被引文献3

  • 1徐昕.论俄罗斯的实用主义外交[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2006(4):93-97. 被引量:2
  • 2熊光楷.国际战略与新军事变革[M]清华大学出版社,2003.
  • 3许嘉.冷战后中国周边安全态势[M]军事科学出版社,2003.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部