期刊文献+

近红外漫反射光谱法快速测定秸秆青贮饲料成分含量 被引量:35

Feasibility of Using Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy for the Analysis of Compositions of Straw Silage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用傅里叶近红外漫反射光谱技术,结合偏最小二乘回归法,以158个不同种类的秸秆青贮饲料样品建立了常规化学成分和发酵成分含量的近红外定量分析校正模型。其中常规化学成分中,粗蛋白、中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维、半纤维素、干物质、粗灰分和酸性洗涤木质素含量的校正模型决定系数R2分别为0.95,0.90,0.86,0.91,0.86,0.95和0.90;发酵成分的pH、乳酸、乙酸、丙酸、丁酸和氨态氮含量的校正模型决定系数R2分别为0.98,0.83,0.85,0.3,0.90和0.92。研究发现除乙酸、丙酸和丁酸之外,其他成分含量的相对分析误差RPD(SD/SECV)均大于2.5;除乳酸、乙酸、丙酸和丁酸之外,所建近红外定量分析模型对独立检验集样品其他成分含量的预测值与化学值的相关决定系数R2均大于0.08。该研究结果对青贮饲料品质的快速检测具有重要的实际意义。 Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) calibrations of chemical composition in 158 straw silage samples were developed by means of partial least-squares (PLS) regression, Results showed that the correlation coefficients of calibration (R^2) were 0. 95, 0.90, 0. 86, 0. 91, 0. 86, 0.95 and 0. 90 for crude protein, neutral detergent fibre, acid detergent fibre, hemicellulose, dry matter, crude ash and acid detergent lignin respeetively; the R^2 of pH, lactic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid and ammonia were 0. 98, 0.83, 0.85, 0. 36, 0. 90 and 0. 92 respectively. The RPD (SD/SECV) of these parameters were all greater than 2.5 except acetic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid, and the correlation coefficients of validation (R^2) of the parameters were all greater than 0. 80 except lactic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid and butyric acid. These results are of great practieal importance in rapid evaluation of silage quality.
作者 刘贤 韩鲁佳
出处 《光谱学与光谱分析》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2006年第11期2016-2020,共5页 Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis
基金 "十五"国家科技攻关计划课题"(2004BA514A16) 饲料资源开发与产业化利用关键技术研究"资助
关键词 近红外漫反射光谱 秸秆 青贮饲料 成分含量 Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy Straw Silage, Composition
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1LU Wan-zhen,YUAN Hong-fu,XU Guang-tong,et al(陆婉珍,袁洪福,徐广通,等).The Modern Analysis Technique for Near-Infrared Spectra(现代近红外光谱分析技术).Beijing:Chinese Oil and Chemical Press(北京:中国石油化工出版社),2001.1.
  • 2Valdes EV. J. Anim. Sci., 1985, 65(3): 753.
  • 3De Boever J L, Cottyn B G, De Brabander D L, et al. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1997, 66(1):211.
  • 4Cozzolino D, Fassio A, Gimenez A, Journal of the Science of Feed and Agriculture, 2000, 81: 142.
  • 5白琪林,陈绍江,董晓玲,孟庆祥,严衍禄,戴景瑞.近红外漫反射光谱法测定玉米秸秆NDF与ADF含量[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2004,24(11):1345-1347. 被引量:44
  • 6Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Official Methods of Analysis, 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, District of Colunmbia, 1990.
  • 7Saag K. HPLC in Food Analysis. Academic Press, 1988, 185.
  • 8闵顺耕,李宁,张明祥.近红外光谱分析中异常值的判别与定量模型优化[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2004,24(10):1205-1209. 被引量:117
  • 9Malley D F, Ronicke H, Findlay D L, et al. Journal of Paleolimnology, 1999, 21: 295.
  • 10Murray I. Forage Analysis by Near Infrared Spectroscopy, in Sward Measurement Handbook, 2nd edn, Ed by Davies A, Baker R D,Grant S A, Laidlaw A S. The British Grassland Society, 1993, 285.

二级参考文献9

  • 1[2]Zimmer E, Gurrath P A, Buxton D R. Euphytica., 1990, 48: 73.
  • 2[3]Jung H G, Mertens D R et al. Crop Sci., 1998, 38: 205.
  • 3[6]Albanell E, Plaixats J, Ferret A. J. Sci. Food Agric., 1995, 69: 269.
  • 4[7]Cozzolino D, Fassio A, Gimenez A. J. Sci. Food Agric., 2001, 81: 142.
  • 5Egan W J, Mogan S L. Analytical Chemistry, 1998, 70(11): 2372.
  • 6XU Guang-tong, YUAN Hong-fu, LU Wan-zhen(徐广通, 袁洪福, 陆婉珍). Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis(光谱学与光谱分析), 2001, 21(4): 459.
  • 7Edwin M, Knorr A I, Raymond T et al. The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases, 2000, 8: 237.
  • 8LUWan-zhen YUANHong-fu XUGuang-tong(陆婉珍 袁洪福 徐广通).The Modern Analysis Technique for Near-infrared Spectra(现代近红外光谱分析技术)[M].Beijing: Chinese Oil and Chemical Press(北京: 中国,2000.193.
  • 9YANYan-lu JINGMao ZHANGLu-da(严衍禄 景茂 张录达).Acta of Beijing Agricultural University(北京农业大学学报·增刊),1990,16:37-37.

共引文献162

同被引文献672

引证文献35

二级引证文献321

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部