1Hearns-Stokes RM, Miller BT, Scott L, et al. Pregnancy rates after embryo transfer depend on the provide at embryo transfer. Fertil Steril,2000,74( 1 ):80-86
2Prapas N, Prapas Y, Panagiotidis Y, et al. Cervical dilatation has a positive impact on the outcome of IVF in randomly assigned cases having two previous difficult embryo transfers. Hum Reprod,2004,19(8):1791-1795
3Serhal P, Ranieri DM, Khadum I, et al. Cervical dilatation with hygroscopic rods prior to ovarian stimulation facihtates embryo transfer. Hum Reprod,2003,18(12):2618-2620
4Buckett WM. A review and metaanalysis of prospective trials comparing different catheters used for embryo transfer. Fertil Steril,2006,85 ( 3 ) :728-734
5Wood EG, Batzer FR, Go K J, et al. Ultrasound-guided soft catheter embryo transfers will improve pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization.Hum Reprod,2000,15 ( 1 ): 107 - 112
6Buckett WM. A meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch embryo transfer. Fertil Steril,2003,80(4):1037-1041
7Coroleu B. The influence of the depth of embryo replacement into the uterine cavity on implantation rates after IVF: a controlled,ultrasound-guided study. Hum Reprod,2003,18(4):889-890
8Spandorfer SD, Goldstein J, Navarro J, et al. Difficult embryo transfer has a negative impact on the outcome of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril,2003,79(3):654-655
9Martinez F, Coroleu B, Parriegu M, et al. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: immediate withdrawal of the catheter versus a 30 second wait. Hum Reprod,2001,16(5):871-874
10Mansour R. Minimizing embryo expulsion after embryo transfer: a randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod,2005,20( 1 ):170-174
