期刊文献+

反倾销对外资进入模式的影响与政府政策的相机抉择 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 反倾销政策为外国企业关税跳跃直接投资提供了激励机制。本文运用博弈思想和方法分析了4种反倾销措施对外国企业进入市场模式的影响,并在此基础上研究了进口国政府在生产者利益最大化或国民福利最大化两种替代目标下时以产品或直接投资两种进入战略的政策反应。本文的最终分析结论是:外国企业市场进入模式选择既受投资固定成本的影响,同时也依赖于政府所采用的政策工具;进口国反倾销政策抉择,既要根据外国企业预期进入战略而变化,又要受政府目标函数的制约。
作者 焦知岳
出处 《财贸经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第11期90-94,共5页 Finance & Trade Economics
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献20

  • 1李圣敬.反倾销法律与诉讼代理[M].法律出版社,2000..
  • 2Vandendenbussche, Reinhilde Veugelers, and Rene A. Belderbos, ?A“Undertakings and Antidumping Jumping FDI in Europe”,CEPR Discussion Paper 2320, 1999.
  • 3Belderbos, Rene A., “Antidumping and Tariff Jumping: Japanese Firms' FDI in the European Union and the United States,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 133 (1997): 419-57.
  • 4Belderbos, and Sleuwaegen, Leo, “Tariff Jumping FDI and Export Substitution: Japanese Electronics Firms in Europe,” International Journal of Industrial Organization 16(1998): 601-38.
  • 5Ishikawa, J.. Who Benefits from Voluntary Export Restraints[J] , Review of International Economics, 1998, (6):129-141.
  • 6Ellingson, T. , K. Warneryd. Foreign Direct Investment and the Political Economies of Protection [ J ] . Review of International Economies, 1999, (40) : 357 - 379.
  • 7Ziss, S.. Vertical Separation and Horizontal Mergers[ J ] . Journal of International Economics, 1995, (43) :63 - 75.
  • 8Elder, R., D. Levin. Trade Liberalization and Domestic Monopoly : A Welfare Analysis [ J ] . International Economic Review, 1990, (31) :773 - 782.
  • 9Harris, R. G.. Why Voluntary Export Restraints are " Voluntary " [ J ] . Canadian Journal of Economics,1985, (18) :799 - 809.
  • 10Mai. C. C, H. Hwang. Voluntary Export Restraints and Firm's Profits in the Presence of Product Differentiation [ J ] . Academic Economic Papers, 1998, (16) :39 - 50.

共引文献17

同被引文献25

  • 1沈瑶,朱益,王继柯.中国反倾销实施中的产业关联研究:以聚氯乙烯案为例[J].国际贸易问题,2005(3):83-87. 被引量:17
  • 2谢建国.经济影响、政治分歧与制度摩擦——美国对华贸易反倾销实证研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(12):8-17. 被引量:110
  • 3鲍晓华.反倾销措施的贸易救济效果评估[J].经济研究,2007,42(2):71-84. 被引量:143
  • 4Aggarwal A, Macroeconomic Determinants of Antidumping: A Comparative Analysis of Developed and Developing Countries, World Development, Vol. 32, 2004, pp. 1043-- 1057.
  • 5Azrak P. and Wynne K. , Protectionism and Japanese Direct Investment in the United States, Journal of Policy Modelling, Vol. 17, No. 3, 1995, pp. 293 -- 305.
  • 6Barrell R. and Pain N., Trade Restraints and Japanese Direct Investment Flows, European Economic Review, Vol. 43, No. I, 1999,pp. 29--45.
  • 7Belderbos R. , Vandenbussche and R. Veugelers, Antidumping Duties, Undertakings, and Foreign Direct Investment in the EU, European Economic Review,Vol. 48, 2004, pp. 429-453.
  • 8Belderbos, R., Antidumping and Tariff Jumping: Japanese Firms' DFI in the European Union and the United States, Weltwirtsehaftliches Archiv, Vol. 133, No. 3, 1997, pp. 419 -- 457.
  • 9Brander, A. and Spencer, B.J. , Foreign Direct Investment with Unemployment and Endogenous Taxes and Tariffs, Journal of International Economic.s, Vol. 22, 1987, pp. 257-- 279.
  • 10Buekley,P. J. , Clegg, L.J. ,Cross, A.R. , Liu, X. , Voss, H. and zhang, p. , The Determinants of Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment, J ournal of International Business Studies, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2007, pp. 499 -- 518.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部