期刊文献+

^(18)F-FDG PET与^(99)Tc^m-MDP显像对肿瘤骨转移的诊断价值 被引量:3

Diagnostic value of ^(18)F-FDG PET and ^(99)Tc^m-MDP imaging in detection bone metastases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨18F-FDGPET与99Tcm-MDP显像对肿瘤骨转移的诊断价值。方法93例肿瘤患者2周内行18F-FDGPET和99Tcm-MDP显像,比较分析两种显像结果。结果93例肿瘤患者PET和MDP诊断骨转移64例。64例骨转移患者中PET和MDP阳性43例,PET阳性而MDP阴性16例,PET阴性而MDP阳性5例。18F-FDGPET和99Tcm-MDP显像诊断骨转移的灵敏度分别为92.2%,75.0%(P<0.05);特异度分别为93.1%,79.3%(P>0.05);准确度分别为92.5%,76.3%(P<0.01)。结论18F-FDGPET诊断肿瘤骨转移的灵敏度和准确性显著高于99Tcm-MDP显像。18F-FDGPET对骨转移有一定的诊断价值。 Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of 18F-FDG PET and 99Tcm-MDP imaging in detection bone metastases. Methods 93 patients were undergone 18F-FDG PET and 99Tcm-MDP imaging within 2 weeks. The results of the 2 different modalities were analyzed. Results Of the 93 patients, 64 patients were found to have bone metastases by PET and MDP imaging. Among the 64 patients, 43 patients were found both positive PET and MDP. 16 patients had positive PET whereas negative MDP. 5 patients had negative PET whereas positive MDP. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET and 99Tcm-MDP imaging were 92.2 %, 75.0 %(P 〈 0.05), 93.1%, 79.3 %(P 〉 0.05), 92.5 %,76.3 %(P 〈 0.01), respectively. Conclusion 18F-FDG PET is more sensitivity and higher accuracy than 99Tcm-MDP imaging. 18F-FDG PET is helpful in detection bone metastases.
出处 《肿瘤研究与临床》 CAS 2006年第11期748-749,共2页 Cancer Research and Clinic
关键词 18F-FDG PET 99Tcm-MDP显像 肿瘤骨转移 18F-FDG PET 99Tcm-MDP imaging Bone metastases
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Cook G J,Houston S,Rubens R,et al.Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer by 18F-FDG PET:differing metabolic activity in osteoblastic and osteolytic lesions[J].Clin Oncol,1998,16(10):3375-3379.
  • 2韩丽君,屈婉莹,何洁,李威,李伟,赵洪山.^(18)F-FDG hPET/CT显像与^(99)Tc^m-MDP骨显像探测骨转移瘤的价值[J].中华核医学杂志,2003,23(4):204-206. 被引量:18
  • 3Yang S N,Liang J A,Lin F J,et al.Comparing whole body (18)F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and technetium-99m methylene diphosphonate bone scan to detect bone metastases in patients with breast cancer[J].Cancer Res Clin Oncol,2002,128(6):325-328.
  • 4Gayed I,Vu T,Johnson M,et al.Comparison of bone and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of bony metastases in lung cancer[J].Mol Imaging Biol,2003,5(1):26-31.
  • 5张驰,周前,陈永辉,李方.^(18)F-FDGPET与^(99)Tc^m-MDP显像诊断肿瘤骨转移的比较[J].中华核医学杂志,2003,23(4):201-203. 被引量:16

二级参考文献13

  • 1程午樱 见:丁虹 赵军 管一晖 主编.G-CSF影响骨髓^18F-FDG摄取一例[A].见:丁虹,赵军,管一晖,主编.PET临床病例精选[C].香港:雅艺出版设计公司,2002.176.178.
  • 2Hsia TC, Shen YY, Yen RF, et al. Comparing whole body ^18F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and ^99Tc^m-methylene diphosphate bone scan to detect bone metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Neoplasma, 2002, 49: 267-271.
  • 3Ohta M, Tokuda Y, Suzuki Y, et al. Whole body PET for the evaluation of bony metastases in patients with breast cancer: comparison with ^99Tc^m-MDP bone scintigraphy. Nucl Med Commun, 2001, 22: 875-879.
  • 4Yang SN, Liang JA, Lin FJ, et al. Comparing whole body ^18F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and ^99Tc^m-methylene diphosphonate bone scan to detect bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2002, 128: 325-328.
  • 5Chung JK, Kim YK, Yoon JK, et al. Diagnostic usefulness of ^18F-FDG whole body PET in detection of bony metastases compared to ^99Tc^m-MDP bone scan. J Nucl Med, 1999, 40: 96P.
  • 6Shreve PD, Grossman HB, Gross MD, et al. Metastatic prostate cancer:initial findings of PET with 2-deoxy-2-^18F-fluoro-D-glucose. Radiology,1996, 199: 751-756.
  • 7Cook GJ, Houston S, Rubens R, et al. Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer by ^18F-FDG PET: differing metabolic activity in osteoblastic and osteolytic lesions. J Clin Oncol, 1998, 16: 3375-3379.
  • 8Daldrup-Link HE, Franzius C, Link TM, et al. Whole-body MR imaging for detection of bone metastases in children mad young adults: comparison with skeletal scintigraphy and FDG PET. Am J Roentgenol, 2001, 177:229-236.
  • 9Gulenchyn KY, Papoff W. ^99Tc^m-MDP scintigraphy: an insensitive tool for the detection of bone marrow metastases. Clin Nucl Med, 1987, 12: 45-46.
  • 10赵军,孙启银,李家敏,王明芳,孙爱君,吴金陵,李娜.^(18)F-FDG PET全身显像与^(99m)Tc-MDP骨显像诊断肿瘤骨转移灶的对比研究[J].核技术,1999,22(5):283-287. 被引量:8

共引文献29

同被引文献21

  • 1卢红阳,马胜林,郭勇,王晓稼,蔡菊芬.髓外浆细胞瘤四例报道并文献复习[J].肿瘤研究与临床,2006,18(10):696-697. 被引量:8
  • 2Adam Greenspan 著,唐光建,译.骨放射学[M].北京:中国医药科技出版社,2003.
  • 3Jacobson JA.Introduction to muscular skeletal ultrasound.Ultrasound Clinics[M].Elsevier Saunders,2008,569-575.
  • 4Langston TH,Kevin TF.Image huidance in spinal surgery[J].Orthopedic Clinics of North America,2007,38:451-461.
  • 5Cook G J, Houston S, Rubens R, et al. Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer by 18F-FDG PET: differing metabolic activity in osteoblastic and osteolytic lesions. Clin Oncol, 1998, 16: 3375-3379.
  • 6Daldrup - Link HE, Franzius C, Link TM, et al. Whole - body MR imaging for detection of bone metastases in children and young adults : comparison with skeletal scintigraphy and FDG PET. Am J Roentgenol, 2001, 177: 229-236.
  • 7Gulenchyn KY, Papoff W. 99Tcm-MDP scintigraphy : an insensitive tool for the detection of bone marrow metastases. Clin Nucl Med, 1987, 12: 45-46.
  • 8Hsia TC, Shen YY, Yen RF, et al. Comparing whole body 18F-2- deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and 99Tcm-methylene diphosphate bone scan to detect bone metastases in palients with non-small cell lung cancer. Neoplasma, 2002, 49:267-271.
  • 9Ohta M, Tokuda Y, Suzuki Y, et al. Whole body PET for the evaluation of bony metastases in patients with breast cancer: comparison with 99Tcm-MDP bone scintigraphy. Nucl Med Commun, 2001, 22: 875-879.
  • 10Yang SN, Liang JA, Lin FJ, et al. Comparing whole body 18F-2- deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and 99Tcm-methylene diphosphonate bone scan to detect bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2002, 128: 325-328.

引证文献3

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部